Log in to subscribe to heads-up notifications for this feed or its category via email, Slack, or Discord.
Ask the AI anything about content, patterns, and edits for Tornevalls Blog. The AI will receive full version history including all edited articles. Open question history.
e1b29ea1412fc0a3e0fa255942e24e1140edd608The long inconvenient story about AI continues… AI should never be your brain. Be your own brain – unless you enjoy looking like a moron in front of everyone.
The biggest mistake people make when asking an AI to write is failing to formulate what they actually want to say. They hand over the task and get back something that technically contains words but lacks personality, direction, and intent. The result is often so generic that it takes more time to fix than it would have taken to write it yourself.
I recently spoke with someone who claimed he was dictating the words (with an app) in his text. And I almost believed him. Certain patterns often reveal when a text is at least partially AI-generated or heavily machine-edited. Typical signs include unnecessary summaries, closing statements like “We hope this was helpful”, and English-influenced phrasing when the target language is Swedish. There are also structural giveaways: misplaced quotation marks, periods inside quotes, wrong types of dashes, and other formatting errors.
This particular case was so interesting so I got it analyzed with the o3 engine. It came to the conclusion that it was more likely written with help from AI, than with the personal touch: https://chatgpt.com/share/680cc747-1a24-8000-9ca7-5c6a1b8bc4b1.
Table of Contents Toggle So what is the real issue?Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!How to became less stupidDid you know how many hyphen-styles there are? So what is the real issue?
The real problem with you using AI is not just bad wording. It's that you risk letting the machine do the thinking for you. And once you do that, your own edge starts to fade. The same goes for your shitty AI music, that we’ve spoken of before here.
AI should never be your brain. It should be your tool. You write. You think. Then, if needed, you let AI help shape the wording, clean up the flow, or simplify where it makes sense. Or just proofread it.
Especially when writing in Swedish, machine-generated texts often reveal their English roots. You’ll see misplaced punctuation, wrong dashes, and direct translations. Many of these things don’t belong in proper Swedish writing. Another common giveaway is the frequent use of phrases like “and yes”, “and no”, “so yes”, “so no”, or any sentence starting with “and” or “so” followed by a conclusion or final statement. These constructions are often overused in AI-generated texts to mimic conversational flow or artificially lead into a summarizing statement. This is a typical AI pattern, used to signal a closing remark or to simulate conversational tone in an unnatural way. Don’t use it! But I hope you find this well…
Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!
If you don't control the AI, the AI will control you. Either way, it won’t get you smarter. It will make you more stupid and someone else smarter. If you don't know exactly what you want to say, the machine will decide for you and then, your content will go sideways or even worse be pointed out as – surprise – machine generated!
How to became less stupid
Write first. Write the text ENTIRELY from the start to till the end!
Use your brain. Let the machine assist – but after you’ve done your part. One way to keep your writing human and distinctive is to clearly define your tone and set strict rules for your GPT. Make it reflect your personality, whether that's cynicism, aggression, humor, or sharp directness. And last but not least: specify your punctuation style if you’re not american or english speaking.
Specify exactly which type of quotation marks it should use. Specify it all, from dashes to dots. The dashes and everything surrounding the language are just as important as your content. Ban clichés, generic phrasing, and predictable AI structures. And most importantly: never allow your GPT to end texts with hollow conclusions, empty summarizations, or polite fluff like “I hope this was helpful” or “To summarize this, it is always important to be politically correct and search for facts”. Is that really something you would say if you wrote the text? Maybe. Personally, I'd sometimes prefer to summarize it with “In short, you’re an idiot and people out there tend to not fact check things before typing it. Don’t be like them!” – if that fits the tone better. Most of the time it doesn't, but neither do typical GPT summaries and clichés.
Even if you ask your GPT to proofread your text, you should always do it yourself too, because there are usually plenty of errors that don't – and never will – reflect you, your personal style or anything else that makes the text unique. Make it unique. Make it yours. Make your licensing fee for ChatGPT matter.
Write rules that prevent the GPT from falling into the usual traps of generic phrasing. Since most users end up using the exact same style, your writing becomes indistinguishable from others and therefore extremely easy to identify as AI-generated.
Also, AI tends to overuse other elements like:
Unnecessary listings like this one...
Excessive use of symbols and formatting gimmicks...
... and last but not least, the very standard and predictable way of wrapping up arguments.
Avoid these patterns. Stay sharp. Stay human. Stay smart, not an idiot.
Did you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
Another easy way to spot machine-generated text is through its inconsistent use of hyphenation and dash styles. Here's a quick overview of the different types -- and yes, there are quite a few:
Hyphen (-): The standard dash used for compound words like “machine-generated” or “state-of-the-art”.
En-dash (-): Slightly longer than the hyphen, traditionally used to indicate ranges (“2023-2025”) or relationships (“Sweden-Norway border”).
Em-dash (--): Longer than both hyphen and en-dash. Used to insert a break in a sentence -- like this. Very common in English, rarely correct in Swedish.
Figure dash (-): Same width as a digit, used in phone numbers like “070-123-4567”. Rarely used by humans.
Horizontal bar (-): Rare and used for quoting or dialogue replacement. Very uncommon in modern writing.
Minus sign (-): Looks like a hyphen but is technically a math symbol. Some AIs mix this up with hyphens.
When these are mixed, misused, or inconsistently applied, it becomes an easy giveaway that the text has been machine-generated or poorly proofread. Just like with quotation marks -- where you have single quotes (‘ ‘), double quotes (” “), smart quotes (" "), straight quotes (” “), and even other localized variants -- these details matter.
Humans who care about their writing usually know the difference. AIs typically don't. Yet another reason why proofreading matters. This is also horrifying, since normally – to avoid this – you have to edit your text one last time after you got it printed by an AI. Even if you ask an AI to fix those errors, it sometimes won’t, so a search and replace will be necessary at some point. But hey, if you taking your time writing crap anyway, it is worth spending some more time to get it right and professional. Again, don’t be an idiot. Don’t lie to those of us, that already know about your errors.
Oh, right. One more thing. I used AI to generate the image…
24f617419f56c3bd19df7c67d80f0dbcc330b3cd
e1b29ea1412fc0a3e0fa255942e24e1140edd608
TITLE:
Oops, did you really write this yourself? (Or how we know that your text is actually GPT-written)
DESCRIPTION:
The long inconvenient story about AI continues…
AI should never be your brain. Be your own brain – unless you enjoy looking like a moron in front of everyone.
CONTENT:
The biggest mistake people make when asking an AI to write is failing to formulate what they actually want to say. They hand over the task and get back something that technically contains words but lacks personality, direction, and intent. The result is often so generic that it takes more time to fix than it would have taken to write it yourself.
I recently spoke with someone who claimed he was dictating the words (with an app) in his text. And I almost believed him. Certain patterns often reveal when a text is at least partially AI-generated or heavily machine-edited. Typical signs include unnecessary summaries, closing statements like “We hope this was helpful”, and English-influenced phrasing when the target language is Swedish. There are also structural giveaways: misplaced quotation marks, periods inside quotes, wrong types of dashes, and other formatting errors.
This particular case was so interesting so I got it analyzed with the o3 engine. It came to the conclusion that it was more likely written with help from AI, than with the personal touch: https://chatgpt.com/share/680cc747-1a24-8000-9ca7-5c6a1b8bc4b1.
Table of Contents
Toggle
So what is the real issue?Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!How to became less stupidDid you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
So what is the real issue?
The real problem with you using AI is not just bad wording. It's that you risk letting the machine do the thinking for you. And once you do that, your own edge starts to fade. The same goes for your shitty AI music, that we’ve spoken of before here.
AI should never be your brain. It should be your tool. You write. You think. Then, if needed, you let AI help shape the wording, clean up the flow, or simplify where it makes sense. Or just proofread it.
Especially when writing in Swedish, machine-generated texts often reveal their English roots. You’ll see misplaced punctuation, wrong dashes, and direct translations. Many of these things don’t belong in proper Swedish writing. Another common giveaway is the frequent use of phrases like “and yes”, “and no”, “so yes”, “so no”, or any sentence starting with “and” or “so” followed by a conclusion or final statement. These constructions are often overused in AI-generated texts to mimic conversational flow or artificially lead into a summarizing statement. This is a typical AI pattern, used to signal a closing remark or to simulate conversational tone in an unnatural way. Don’t use it! But I hope you find this well…
Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!
If you don't control the AI, the AI will control you. Either way, it won’t get you smarter. It will make you more stupid and someone else smarter. If you don't know exactly what you want to say, the machine will decide for you and then, your content will go sideways or even worse be pointed out as – surprise – machine generated!
How to became less stupid
Write first. Write the text ENTIRELY from the start to till the end!
Use your brain. Let the machine assist – but after you’ve done your part. One way to keep your writing human and distinctive is to clearly define your tone and set strict rules for your GPT. Make it reflect your personality, whether that's cynicism, aggression, humor, or sharp directness. And last but not least: specify your punctuation style if you’re not american or english speaking.
Specify exactly which type of quotation marks it should use. Specify it all, from dashes to dots. The dashes and everything surrounding the language are just as important as your content. Ban clichés, generic phrasing, and predictable AI structures. And most importantly: never allow your GPT to end texts with hollow conclusions, empty summarizations, or polite fluff like “I hope this was helpful” or “To summarize this, it is always important to be politically correct and search for facts”. Is that really something you would say if you wrote the text? Maybe. Personally, I'd sometimes prefer to summarize it with “In short, you’re an idiot and people out there tend to not fact check things before typing it. Don’t be like them!” – if that fits the tone better. Most of the time it doesn't, but neither do typical GPT summaries and clichés.
Even if you ask your GPT to proofread your text, you should always do it yourself too, because there are usually plenty of errors that don't – and never will – reflect you, your personal style or anything else that makes the text unique. Make it unique. Make it yours. Make your licensing fee for ChatGPT matter.
Write rules that prevent the GPT from falling into the usual traps of generic phrasing. Since most users end up using the exact same style, your writing becomes indistinguishable from others and therefore extremely easy to identify as AI-generated.
Also, AI tends to overuse other elements like:
Unnecessary listings like this one...
Excessive use of symbols and formatting gimmicks...
... and last but not least, the very standard and predictable way of wrapping up arguments.
Avoid these patterns. Stay sharp. Stay human. Stay smart, not an idiot.
Did you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
Another easy way to spot machine-generated text is through its inconsistent use of hyphenation and dash styles. Here's a quick overview of the different types - and yes, there are quite a few:
Hyphen (-): The standard dash used for compound words like “machine-generated” or “state-of-the-art”.
En-dash (-): Slightly longer than the hyphen, traditionally used to indicate ranges (“2023-2025”) or relationships (“Sweden-Norway border”).
Em-dash (-): Longer than both hyphen and en-dash. Used to insert a break in a sentence - like this. Very common in English, rarely correct in Swedish.
Figure dash (‒): Same width as a digit, used in phone numbers like “070‒123‒4567”. Rarely used by humans.
Horizontal bar (―): Rare and used for quoting or dialogue replacement. Very uncommon in modern writing.
Minus sign (−): Looks like a hyphen but is technically a math symbol. Some AIs mix this up with hyphens.
When these are mixed, misused, or inconsistently applied, it becomes an easy giveaway that the text has been machine-generated or poorly proofread. Just like with quotation marks - where you have single quotes (‘ ‘), double quotes (” “), smart quotes (" "), straight quotes (” “), and even other localized variants - these details matter.
Humans who care about their writing usually know the difference. AIs typically don't. Yet another reason why proofreading matters. This is also horrifying, since normally – to avoid this – you have to edit your text one last time after you got it printed by an AI. Even if you ask an AI to fix those errors, it sometimes won’t, so a search and replace will be necessary at some point. But hey, if you taking your time writing crap anyway, it is worth spending some more time to get it right and professional. Again, don’t be an idiot. Don’t lie to those of us, that already know about your errors.
Oh, right. One more thing. I used AI to generate the image…
TITLE:
Oops, did you really write this yourself? (Or how we know that your text is actually GPT-written)
DESCRIPTION:
The long inconvenient story about AI continues…
AI should never be your brain. Be your own brain – unless you enjoy looking like a moron in front of everyone.
CONTENT:
The biggest mistake people make when asking an AI to write is failing to formulate what they actually want to say. They hand over the task and get back something that technically contains words but lacks personality, direction, and intent. The result is often so generic that it takes more time to fix than it would have taken to write it yourself.
I recently spoke with someone who claimed he was dictating the words (with an app) in his text. And I almost believed him. Certain patterns often reveal when a text is at least partially AI-generated or heavily machine-edited. Typical signs include unnecessary summaries, closing statements like “We hope this was helpful”, and English-influenced phrasing when the target language is Swedish. There are also structural giveaways: misplaced quotation marks, periods inside quotes, wrong types of dashes, and other formatting errors.
This particular case was so interesting so I got it analyzed with the o3 engine. It came to the conclusion that it was more likely written with help from AI, than with the personal touch: https://chatgpt.com/share/680cc747-1a24-8000-9ca7-5c6a1b8bc4b1.
Table of Contents
Toggle
So what is the real issue?Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!How to became less stupidDid you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
So what is the real issue?
The real problem with you using AI is not just bad wording. It's that you risk letting the machine do the thinking for you. And once you do that, your own edge starts to fade. The same goes for your shitty AI music, that we’ve spoken of before here.
AI should never be your brain. It should be your tool. You write. You think. Then, if needed, you let AI help shape the wording, clean up the flow, or simplify where it makes sense. Or just proofread it.
Especially when writing in Swedish, machine-generated texts often reveal their English roots. You’ll see misplaced punctuation, wrong dashes, and direct translations. Many of these things don’t belong in proper Swedish writing. Another common giveaway is the frequent use of phrases like “and yes”, “and no”, “so yes”, “so no”, or any sentence starting with “and” or “so” followed by a conclusion or final statement. These constructions are often overused in AI-generated texts to mimic conversational flow or artificially lead into a summarizing statement. This is a typical AI pattern, used to signal a closing remark or to simulate conversational tone in an unnatural way. Don’t use it! But I hope you find this well…
Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!
If you don't control the AI, the AI will control you. Either way, it won’t get you smarter. It will make you more stupid and someone else smarter. If you don't know exactly what you want to say, the machine will decide for you and then, your content will go sideways or even worse be pointed out as – surprise – machine generated!
How to became less stupid
Write first. Write the text ENTIRELY from the start to till the end!
Use your brain. Let the machine assist – but after you’ve done your part. One way to keep your writing human and distinctive is to clearly define your tone and set strict rules for your GPT. Make it reflect your personality, whether that's cynicism, aggression, humor, or sharp directness. And last but not least: specify your punctuation style if you’re not american or english speaking.
Specify exactly which type of quotation marks it should use. Specify it all, from dashes to dots. The dashes and everything surrounding the language are just as important as your content. Ban clichés, generic phrasing, and predictable AI structures. And most importantly: never allow your GPT to end texts with hollow conclusions, empty summarizations, or polite fluff like “I hope this was helpful” or “To summarize this, it is always important to be politically correct and search for facts”. Is that really something you would say if you wrote the text? Maybe. Personally, I'd sometimes prefer to summarize it with “In short, you’re an idiot and people out there tend to not fact check things before typing it. Don’t be like them!” – if that fits the tone better. Most of the time it doesn't, but neither do typical GPT summaries and clichés.
Even if you ask your GPT to proofread your text, you should always do it yourself too, because there are usually plenty of errors that don't – and never will – reflect you, your personal style or anything else that makes the text unique. Make it unique. Make it yours. Make your licensing fee for ChatGPT matter.
Write rules that prevent the GPT from falling into the usual traps of generic phrasing. Since most users end up using the exact same style, your writing becomes indistinguishable from others and therefore extremely easy to identify as AI-generated.
Also, AI tends to overuse other elements like:
Unnecessary listings like this one...
Excessive use of symbols and formatting gimmicks...
... and last but not least, the very standard and predictable way of wrapping up arguments.
Avoid these patterns. Stay sharp. Stay human. Stay smart, not an idiot.
Did you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
Another easy way to spot machine-generated text is through its inconsistent use of hyphenation and dash styles. Here's a quick overview of the different types -- and yes, there are quite a few:
Hyphen (-): The standard dash used for compound words like “machine-generated” or “state-of-the-art”.
En-dash (-): Slightly longer than the hyphen, traditionally used to indicate ranges (“2023-2025”) or relationships (“Sweden-Norway border”).
Em-dash (--): Longer than both hyphen and en-dash. Used to insert a break in a sentence -- like this. Very common in English, rarely correct in Swedish.
Figure dash (-): Same width as a digit, used in phone numbers like “070-123-4567”. Rarely used by humans.
Horizontal bar (-): Rare and used for quoting or dialogue replacement. Very uncommon in modern writing.
Minus sign (-): Looks like a hyphen but is technically a math symbol. Some AIs mix this up with hyphens.
When these are mixed, misused, or inconsistently applied, it becomes an easy giveaway that the text has been machine-generated or poorly proofread. Just like with quotation marks -- where you have single quotes (‘ ‘), double quotes (” “), smart quotes (" "), straight quotes (” “), and even other localized variants -- these details matter.
Humans who care about their writing usually know the difference. AIs typically don't. Yet another reason why proofreading matters. This is also horrifying, since normally – to avoid this – you have to edit your text one last time after you got it printed by an AI. Even if you ask an AI to fix those errors, it sometimes won’t, so a search and replace will be necessary at some point. But hey, if you taking your time writing crap anyway, it is worth spending some more time to get it right and professional. Again, don’t be an idiot. Don’t lie to those of us, that already know about your errors.
Oh, right. One more thing. I used AI to generate the image…
e1b29ea1412fc0a3e0fa255942e24e1140edd608
24f617419f56c3bd19df7c67d80f0dbcc330b3cd
24f617419f56c3bd19df7c67d80f0dbcc330b3cdThe long inconvenient story about AI continues… AI should never be your brain. Be your own brain – unless you enjoy looking like a moron in front of everyone.
The biggest mistake people make when asking an AI to write is failing to formulate what they actually want to say. They hand over the task and get back something that technically contains words but lacks personality, direction, and intent. The result is often so generic that it takes more time to fix than it would have taken to write it yourself.
I recently spoke with someone who claimed he was dictating the words (with an app) in his text. And I almost believed him. Certain patterns often reveal when a text is at least partially AI-generated or heavily machine-edited. Typical signs include unnecessary summaries, closing statements like “We hope this was helpful”, and English-influenced phrasing when the target language is Swedish. There are also structural giveaways: misplaced quotation marks, periods inside quotes, wrong types of dashes, and other formatting errors.
This particular case was so interesting so I got it analyzed with the o3 engine. It came to the conclusion that it was more likely written with help from AI, than with the personal touch: https://chatgpt.com/share/680cc747-1a24-8000-9ca7-5c6a1b8bc4b1.
Table of Contents Toggle So what is the real issue?Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!How to became less stupidDid you know how many hyphen-styles there are? So what is the real issue?
The real problem with you using AI is not just bad wording. It's that you risk letting the machine do the thinking for you. And once you do that, your own edge starts to fade. The same goes for your shitty AI music, that we’ve spoken of before here.
AI should never be your brain. It should be your tool. You write. You think. Then, if needed, you let AI help shape the wording, clean up the flow, or simplify where it makes sense. Or just proofread it.
Especially when writing in Swedish, machine-generated texts often reveal their English roots. You’ll see misplaced punctuation, wrong dashes, and direct translations. Many of these things don’t belong in proper Swedish writing. Another common giveaway is the frequent use of phrases like “and yes”, “and no”, “so yes”, “so no”, or any sentence starting with “and” or “so” followed by a conclusion or final statement. These constructions are often overused in AI-generated texts to mimic conversational flow or artificially lead into a summarizing statement. This is a typical AI pattern, used to signal a closing remark or to simulate conversational tone in an unnatural way. Don’t use it! But I hope you find this well…
Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!
If you don't control the AI, the AI will control you. Either way, it won’t get you smarter. It will make you more stupid and someone else smarter. If you don't know exactly what you want to say, the machine will decide for you and then, your content will go sideways or even worse be pointed out as – surprise – machine generated!
How to became less stupid
Write first. Write the text ENTIRELY from the start to till the end!
Use your brain. Let the machine assist – but after you’ve done your part. One way to keep your writing human and distinctive is to clearly define your tone and set strict rules for your GPT. Make it reflect your personality, whether that's cynicism, aggression, humor, or sharp directness. And last but not least: specify your punctuation style if you’re not american or english speaking.
Specify exactly which type of quotation marks it should use. Specify it all, from dashes to dots. The dashes and everything surrounding the language are just as important as your content. Ban clichés, generic phrasing, and predictable AI structures. And most importantly: never allow your GPT to end texts with hollow conclusions, empty summarizations, or polite fluff like “I hope this was helpful” or “To summarize this, it is always important to be politically correct and search for facts”. Is that really something you would say if you wrote the text? Maybe. Personally, I'd sometimes prefer to summarize it with “In short, you’re an idiot and people out there tend to not fact check things before typing it. Don’t be like them!” – if that fits the tone better. Most of the time it doesn't, but neither do typical GPT summaries and clichés.
Even if you ask your GPT to proofread your text, you should always do it yourself too, because there are usually plenty of errors that don't – and never will – reflect you, your personal style or anything else that makes the text unique. Make it unique. Make it yours. Make your licensing fee for ChatGPT matter.
Write rules that prevent the GPT from falling into the usual traps of generic phrasing. Since most users end up using the exact same style, your writing becomes indistinguishable from others and therefore extremely easy to identify as AI-generated.
Also, AI tends to overuse other elements like:
Unnecessary listings like this one...
Excessive use of symbols and formatting gimmicks...
... and last but not least, the very standard and predictable way of wrapping up arguments.
Avoid these patterns. Stay sharp. Stay human. Stay smart, not an idiot.
Did you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
Another easy way to spot machine-generated text is through its inconsistent use of hyphenation and dash styles. Here's a quick overview of the different types - and yes, there are quite a few:
Hyphen (-): The standard dash used for compound words like “machine-generated” or “state-of-the-art”.
En-dash (-): Slightly longer than the hyphen, traditionally used to indicate ranges (“2023-2025”) or relationships (“Sweden-Norway border”).
Em-dash (-): Longer than both hyphen and en-dash. Used to insert a break in a sentence - like this. Very common in English, rarely correct in Swedish.
Figure dash (‒): Same width as a digit, used in phone numbers like “070‒123‒4567”. Rarely used by humans.
Horizontal bar (―): Rare and used for quoting or dialogue replacement. Very uncommon in modern writing.
Minus sign (−): Looks like a hyphen but is technically a math symbol. Some AIs mix this up with hyphens.
When these are mixed, misused, or inconsistently applied, it becomes an easy giveaway that the text has been machine-generated or poorly proofread. Just like with quotation marks - where you have single quotes (‘ ‘), double quotes (” “), smart quotes (" "), straight quotes (” “), and even other localized variants - these details matter.
Humans who care about their writing usually know the difference. AIs typically don't. Yet another reason why proofreading matters. This is also horrifying, since normally – to avoid this – you have to edit your text one last time after you got it printed by an AI. Even if you ask an AI to fix those errors, it sometimes won’t, so a search and replace will be necessary at some point. But hey, if you taking your time writing crap anyway, it is worth spending some more time to get it right and professional. Again, don’t be an idiot. Don’t lie to those of us, that already know about your errors.
Oh, right. One more thing. I used AI to generate the image…
24f617419f56c3bd19df7c67d80f0dbcc330b3cd
e1b29ea1412fc0a3e0fa255942e24e1140edd608
TITLE:
Oops, did you really write this yourself? (Or how we know that your text is actually GPT-written)
DESCRIPTION:
The long inconvenient story about AI continues…
AI should never be your brain. Be your own brain – unless you enjoy looking like a moron in front of everyone.
CONTENT:
The biggest mistake people make when asking an AI to write is failing to formulate what they actually want to say. They hand over the task and get back something that technically contains words but lacks personality, direction, and intent. The result is often so generic that it takes more time to fix than it would have taken to write it yourself.
I recently spoke with someone who claimed he was dictating the words (with an app) in his text. And I almost believed him. Certain patterns often reveal when a text is at least partially AI-generated or heavily machine-edited. Typical signs include unnecessary summaries, closing statements like “We hope this was helpful”, and English-influenced phrasing when the target language is Swedish. There are also structural giveaways: misplaced quotation marks, periods inside quotes, wrong types of dashes, and other formatting errors.
This particular case was so interesting so I got it analyzed with the o3 engine. It came to the conclusion that it was more likely written with help from AI, than with the personal touch: https://chatgpt.com/share/680cc747-1a24-8000-9ca7-5c6a1b8bc4b1.
Table of Contents
Toggle
So what is the real issue?Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!How to became less stupidDid you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
So what is the real issue?
The real problem with you using AI is not just bad wording. It's that you risk letting the machine do the thinking for you. And once you do that, your own edge starts to fade. The same goes for your shitty AI music, that we’ve spoken of before here.
AI should never be your brain. It should be your tool. You write. You think. Then, if needed, you let AI help shape the wording, clean up the flow, or simplify where it makes sense. Or just proofread it.
Especially when writing in Swedish, machine-generated texts often reveal their English roots. You’ll see misplaced punctuation, wrong dashes, and direct translations. Many of these things don’t belong in proper Swedish writing. Another common giveaway is the frequent use of phrases like “and yes”, “and no”, “so yes”, “so no”, or any sentence starting with “and” or “so” followed by a conclusion or final statement. These constructions are often overused in AI-generated texts to mimic conversational flow or artificially lead into a summarizing statement. This is a typical AI pattern, used to signal a closing remark or to simulate conversational tone in an unnatural way. Don’t use it! But I hope you find this well…
Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!
If you don't control the AI, the AI will control you. Either way, it won’t get you smarter. It will make you more stupid and someone else smarter. If you don't know exactly what you want to say, the machine will decide for you and then, your content will go sideways or even worse be pointed out as – surprise – machine generated!
How to became less stupid
Write first. Write the text ENTIRELY from the start to till the end!
Use your brain. Let the machine assist – but after you’ve done your part. One way to keep your writing human and distinctive is to clearly define your tone and set strict rules for your GPT. Make it reflect your personality, whether that's cynicism, aggression, humor, or sharp directness. And last but not least: specify your punctuation style if you’re not american or english speaking.
Specify exactly which type of quotation marks it should use. Specify it all, from dashes to dots. The dashes and everything surrounding the language are just as important as your content. Ban clichés, generic phrasing, and predictable AI structures. And most importantly: never allow your GPT to end texts with hollow conclusions, empty summarizations, or polite fluff like “I hope this was helpful” or “To summarize this, it is always important to be politically correct and search for facts”. Is that really something you would say if you wrote the text? Maybe. Personally, I'd sometimes prefer to summarize it with “In short, you’re an idiot and people out there tend to not fact check things before typing it. Don’t be like them!” – if that fits the tone better. Most of the time it doesn't, but neither do typical GPT summaries and clichés.
Even if you ask your GPT to proofread your text, you should always do it yourself too, because there are usually plenty of errors that don't – and never will – reflect you, your personal style or anything else that makes the text unique. Make it unique. Make it yours. Make your licensing fee for ChatGPT matter.
Write rules that prevent the GPT from falling into the usual traps of generic phrasing. Since most users end up using the exact same style, your writing becomes indistinguishable from others and therefore extremely easy to identify as AI-generated.
Also, AI tends to overuse other elements like:
Unnecessary listings like this one...
Excessive use of symbols and formatting gimmicks...
... and last but not least, the very standard and predictable way of wrapping up arguments.
Avoid these patterns. Stay sharp. Stay human. Stay smart, not an idiot.
Did you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
Another easy way to spot machine-generated text is through its inconsistent use of hyphenation and dash styles. Here's a quick overview of the different types - and yes, there are quite a few:
Hyphen (-): The standard dash used for compound words like “machine-generated” or “state-of-the-art”.
En-dash (-): Slightly longer than the hyphen, traditionally used to indicate ranges (“2023-2025”) or relationships (“Sweden-Norway border”).
Em-dash (-): Longer than both hyphen and en-dash. Used to insert a break in a sentence - like this. Very common in English, rarely correct in Swedish.
Figure dash (‒): Same width as a digit, used in phone numbers like “070‒123‒4567”. Rarely used by humans.
Horizontal bar (―): Rare and used for quoting or dialogue replacement. Very uncommon in modern writing.
Minus sign (−): Looks like a hyphen but is technically a math symbol. Some AIs mix this up with hyphens.
When these are mixed, misused, or inconsistently applied, it becomes an easy giveaway that the text has been machine-generated or poorly proofread. Just like with quotation marks - where you have single quotes (‘ ‘), double quotes (” “), smart quotes (" "), straight quotes (” “), and even other localized variants - these details matter.
Humans who care about their writing usually know the difference. AIs typically don't. Yet another reason why proofreading matters. This is also horrifying, since normally – to avoid this – you have to edit your text one last time after you got it printed by an AI. Even if you ask an AI to fix those errors, it sometimes won’t, so a search and replace will be necessary at some point. But hey, if you taking your time writing crap anyway, it is worth spending some more time to get it right and professional. Again, don’t be an idiot. Don’t lie to those of us, that already know about your errors.
Oh, right. One more thing. I used AI to generate the image…
TITLE:
Oops, did you really write this yourself? (Or how we know that your text is actually GPT-written)
DESCRIPTION:
The long inconvenient story about AI continues…
AI should never be your brain. Be your own brain – unless you enjoy looking like a moron in front of everyone.
CONTENT:
The biggest mistake people make when asking an AI to write is failing to formulate what they actually want to say. They hand over the task and get back something that technically contains words but lacks personality, direction, and intent. The result is often so generic that it takes more time to fix than it would have taken to write it yourself.
I recently spoke with someone who claimed he was dictating the words (with an app) in his text. And I almost believed him. Certain patterns often reveal when a text is at least partially AI-generated or heavily machine-edited. Typical signs include unnecessary summaries, closing statements like “We hope this was helpful”, and English-influenced phrasing when the target language is Swedish. There are also structural giveaways: misplaced quotation marks, periods inside quotes, wrong types of dashes, and other formatting errors.
This particular case was so interesting so I got it analyzed with the o3 engine. It came to the conclusion that it was more likely written with help from AI, than with the personal touch: https://chatgpt.com/share/680cc747-1a24-8000-9ca7-5c6a1b8bc4b1.
Table of Contents
Toggle
So what is the real issue?Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!How to became less stupidDid you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
So what is the real issue?
The real problem with you using AI is not just bad wording. It's that you risk letting the machine do the thinking for you. And once you do that, your own edge starts to fade. The same goes for your shitty AI music, that we’ve spoken of before here.
AI should never be your brain. It should be your tool. You write. You think. Then, if needed, you let AI help shape the wording, clean up the flow, or simplify where it makes sense. Or just proofread it.
Especially when writing in Swedish, machine-generated texts often reveal their English roots. You’ll see misplaced punctuation, wrong dashes, and direct translations. Many of these things don’t belong in proper Swedish writing. Another common giveaway is the frequent use of phrases like “and yes”, “and no”, “so yes”, “so no”, or any sentence starting with “and” or “so” followed by a conclusion or final statement. These constructions are often overused in AI-generated texts to mimic conversational flow or artificially lead into a summarizing statement. This is a typical AI pattern, used to signal a closing remark or to simulate conversational tone in an unnatural way. Don’t use it! But I hope you find this well…
Or maybe not. Don’t find it well. Write it yourself for gods sake!
If you don't control the AI, the AI will control you. Either way, it won’t get you smarter. It will make you more stupid and someone else smarter. If you don't know exactly what you want to say, the machine will decide for you and then, your content will go sideways or even worse be pointed out as – surprise – machine generated!
How to became less stupid
Write first. Write the text ENTIRELY from the start to till the end!
Use your brain. Let the machine assist – but after you’ve done your part. One way to keep your writing human and distinctive is to clearly define your tone and set strict rules for your GPT. Make it reflect your personality, whether that's cynicism, aggression, humor, or sharp directness. And last but not least: specify your punctuation style if you’re not american or english speaking.
Specify exactly which type of quotation marks it should use. Specify it all, from dashes to dots. The dashes and everything surrounding the language are just as important as your content. Ban clichés, generic phrasing, and predictable AI structures. And most importantly: never allow your GPT to end texts with hollow conclusions, empty summarizations, or polite fluff like “I hope this was helpful” or “To summarize this, it is always important to be politically correct and search for facts”. Is that really something you would say if you wrote the text? Maybe. Personally, I'd sometimes prefer to summarize it with “In short, you’re an idiot and people out there tend to not fact check things before typing it. Don’t be like them!” – if that fits the tone better. Most of the time it doesn't, but neither do typical GPT summaries and clichés.
Even if you ask your GPT to proofread your text, you should always do it yourself too, because there are usually plenty of errors that don't – and never will – reflect you, your personal style or anything else that makes the text unique. Make it unique. Make it yours. Make your licensing fee for ChatGPT matter.
Write rules that prevent the GPT from falling into the usual traps of generic phrasing. Since most users end up using the exact same style, your writing becomes indistinguishable from others and therefore extremely easy to identify as AI-generated.
Also, AI tends to overuse other elements like:
Unnecessary listings like this one...
Excessive use of symbols and formatting gimmicks...
... and last but not least, the very standard and predictable way of wrapping up arguments.
Avoid these patterns. Stay sharp. Stay human. Stay smart, not an idiot.
Did you know how many hyphen-styles there are?
Another easy way to spot machine-generated text is through its inconsistent use of hyphenation and dash styles. Here's a quick overview of the different types -- and yes, there are quite a few:
Hyphen (-): The standard dash used for compound words like “machine-generated” or “state-of-the-art”.
En-dash (-): Slightly longer than the hyphen, traditionally used to indicate ranges (“2023-2025”) or relationships (“Sweden-Norway border”).
Em-dash (--): Longer than both hyphen and en-dash. Used to insert a break in a sentence -- like this. Very common in English, rarely correct in Swedish.
Figure dash (-): Same width as a digit, used in phone numbers like “070-123-4567”. Rarely used by humans.
Horizontal bar (-): Rare and used for quoting or dialogue replacement. Very uncommon in modern writing.
Minus sign (-): Looks like a hyphen but is technically a math symbol. Some AIs mix this up with hyphens.
When these are mixed, misused, or inconsistently applied, it becomes an easy giveaway that the text has been machine-generated or poorly proofread. Just like with quotation marks -- where you have single quotes (‘ ‘), double quotes (” “), smart quotes (" "), straight quotes (” “), and even other localized variants -- these details matter.
Humans who care about their writing usually know the difference. AIs typically don't. Yet another reason why proofreading matters. This is also horrifying, since normally – to avoid this – you have to edit your text one last time after you got it printed by an AI. Even if you ask an AI to fix those errors, it sometimes won’t, so a search and replace will be necessary at some point. But hey, if you taking your time writing crap anyway, it is worth spending some more time to get it right and professional. Again, don’t be an idiot. Don’t lie to those of us, that already know about your errors.
Oh, right. One more thing. I used AI to generate the image…
e1b29ea1412fc0a3e0fa255942e24e1140edd608
24f617419f56c3bd19df7c67d80f0dbcc330b3cd
f6729f7bf5421fe2e575c2eca9eaccfa48bd6913It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific...
It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific words like “remix” and “alter ego” (apparently). If you’re trying to distribute music you didn’t create yourself but have the right to redistribute through other agreements and contracts, you should be careful with how you present the work.
A featured “remixer” (meaning the artist) must be someone other than the original creator (so I can’t remix my own track and label it as remixed). That gets it rejected immediately, partly because it lacks “signed agreements” for the work. This means I’d need to write a contract with myself and prove I have the rights to do so. I haven’t verified if that even works, because I honestly couldn’t be bothered to deal with their crap.
Erik Vilde’s “En vacker dag” did, in fact, have a signed contract, which I assume is what primarily enabled its distribution, but SoundCloud still turned out to be incredibly stubborn. It seems the contract itself isn’t accepted locally by them when it comes to monetization on their own platform. And we even used DocuSign with digital fingerprints to release the original on Spotify.
But the latest thing I discovered was during the release of “Bass Assassin Protocol” (which had a different title at first), where I use two artist names that I’m planning to claim after next week once it drops. The description said my “alter egos” were involved. That caused the release to be denied, along with the fact that the artist names were written in the title. But the reasons were obviously bogus.
You’re apparently not allowed to name artist aliases as alter egos. Meaning, if you include yourself under another artist name and describe it as an alter ego in the description, it gets denied. But if you list them as featured artists without mentioning that they’re alter egos, they’re treated as separate artists and the release gets approved.
Why SoundCloud operates like this is beyond me. My guess is it has to do with strict regulations further down the chain, and SoundCloud acts this aggressively because they know how hard it is to get releases approved otherwise. But I seriously hate it, because sometimes their rules make absolutely no sense.
So why do I go through all this trouble then? Well, because as a remixing artist, I want to be able to distribute tracks differently than if I were the primary artist on someone else’s work. It’s out of respect for my collaborators that I want to present the tracks differently when they’re released. But apparently you’re not always allowed to do that, which means you have to cheat with both the titles and artist names.
So far it’s worked out, but I doubt this will hold forever. One day, some artist I represent is going to be seriously pissed…
Initially posted at Facebook:
f44d0f392a96d96a3d294360a17f654e79bc7663
f6729f7bf5421fe2e575c2eca9eaccfa48bd6913
TITLE: Issues with SoundCloud distribution? This is what I struggle with DESCRIPTION: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific... CONTENT: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific words like “remix” and “alter ego” (apparently). If you’re trying to distribute music you didn’t create yourself but have the right to redistribute through other agreements and contracts, you should be careful with how you present the work. A featured “remixer” (meaning the artist) must be someone other than the original creator (so I can't remix my own track and label it as remixed). That gets it rejected immediately, partly because it lacks “signed agreements” for the work. This means I'd need to write a contract with myself and prove I have the rights to do so. I haven't verified if that even works, because I honestly couldn't be bothered to deal with their crap. Erik Vilde's “En vacker dag” did, in fact, have a signed contract, which I assume is what primarily enabled its distribution, but SoundCloud still turned out to be incredibly stubborn. It seems the contract itself isn't accepted locally by them when it comes to monetization on their own platform. And we even used DocuSign with digital fingerprints to release the original on Spotify. But the latest thing I discovered was during the release of “Bass Assassin Protocol” (which had a different title at first), where I use two artist names that I'm planning to claim after next week once it drops. The description said my “alter egos” were involved. That caused the release to be denied, along with the fact that the artist names were written in the title. But the reasons were obviously bogus. You’re apparently not allowed to name artist aliases as alter egos. Meaning, if you include yourself under another artist name and describe it as an alter ego in the description, it gets denied. But if you list them as featured artists without mentioning that they’re alter egos, they're treated as separate artists and the release gets approved. Why SoundCloud operates like this is beyond me. My guess is it has to do with strict regulations further down the chain, and SoundCloud acts this aggressively because they know how hard it is to get releases approved otherwise. But I seriously hate it, because sometimes their rules make absolutely no sense. So why do I go through all this trouble then? Well, because as a remixing artist, I want to be able to distribute tracks differently than if I were the primary artist on someone else's work. It’s out of respect for my collaborators that I want to present the tracks differently when they're released. But apparently you're not always allowed to do that, which means you have to cheat with both the titles and artist names. So far it's worked out, but I doubt this will hold forever. One day, some artist I represent is going to be seriously pissed… Initially posted at Facebook:
TITLE: Issues with SoundCloud distribution? This is what I struggle with DESCRIPTION: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific... CONTENT: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific words like “remix” and “alter ego” (apparently). If you’re trying to distribute music you didn’t create yourself but have the right to redistribute through other agreements and contracts, you should be careful with how you present the work. A featured “remixer” (meaning the artist) must be someone other than the original creator (so I can’t remix my own track and label it as remixed). That gets it rejected immediately, partly because it lacks “signed agreements” for the work. This means I’d need to write a contract with myself and prove I have the rights to do so. I haven’t verified if that even works, because I honestly couldn’t be bothered to deal with their crap. Erik Vilde’s “En vacker dag” did, in fact, have a signed contract, which I assume is what primarily enabled its distribution, but SoundCloud still turned out to be incredibly stubborn. It seems the contract itself isn’t accepted locally by them when it comes to monetization on their own platform. And we even used DocuSign with digital fingerprints to release the original on Spotify. But the latest thing I discovered was during the release of “Bass Assassin Protocol” (which had a different title at first), where I use two artist names that I’m planning to claim after next week once it drops. The description said my “alter egos” were involved. That caused the release to be denied, along with the fact that the artist names were written in the title. But the reasons were obviously bogus. You’re apparently not allowed to name artist aliases as alter egos. Meaning, if you include yourself under another artist name and describe it as an alter ego in the description, it gets denied. But if you list them as featured artists without mentioning that they’re alter egos, they’re treated as separate artists and the release gets approved. Why SoundCloud operates like this is beyond me. My guess is it has to do with strict regulations further down the chain, and SoundCloud acts this aggressively because they know how hard it is to get releases approved otherwise. But I seriously hate it, because sometimes their rules make absolutely no sense. So why do I go through all this trouble then? Well, because as a remixing artist, I want to be able to distribute tracks differently than if I were the primary artist on someone else’s work. It’s out of respect for my collaborators that I want to present the tracks differently when they’re released. But apparently you’re not always allowed to do that, which means you have to cheat with both the titles and artist names. So far it’s worked out, but I doubt this will hold forever. One day, some artist I represent is going to be seriously pissed… Initially posted at Facebook:
f6729f7bf5421fe2e575c2eca9eaccfa48bd6913
f44d0f392a96d96a3d294360a17f654e79bc7663
f44d0f392a96d96a3d294360a17f654e79bc7663It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific...
It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific words like “remix” and “alter ego” (apparently). If you’re trying to distribute music you didn’t create yourself but have the right to redistribute through other agreements and contracts, you should be careful with how you present the work.
A featured “remixer” (meaning the artist) must be someone other than the original creator (so I can't remix my own track and label it as remixed). That gets it rejected immediately, partly because it lacks “signed agreements” for the work. This means I'd need to write a contract with myself and prove I have the rights to do so. I haven't verified if that even works, because I honestly couldn't be bothered to deal with their crap.
Erik Vilde's “En vacker dag” did, in fact, have a signed contract, which I assume is what primarily enabled its distribution, but SoundCloud still turned out to be incredibly stubborn. It seems the contract itself isn't accepted locally by them when it comes to monetization on their own platform. And we even used DocuSign with digital fingerprints to release the original on Spotify.
But the latest thing I discovered was during the release of “Bass Assassin Protocol” (which had a different title at first), where I use two artist names that I'm planning to claim after next week once it drops. The description said my “alter egos” were involved. That caused the release to be denied, along with the fact that the artist names were written in the title. But the reasons were obviously bogus.
You’re apparently not allowed to name artist aliases as alter egos. Meaning, if you include yourself under another artist name and describe it as an alter ego in the description, it gets denied. But if you list them as featured artists without mentioning that they’re alter egos, they're treated as separate artists and the release gets approved.
Why SoundCloud operates like this is beyond me. My guess is it has to do with strict regulations further down the chain, and SoundCloud acts this aggressively because they know how hard it is to get releases approved otherwise. But I seriously hate it, because sometimes their rules make absolutely no sense.
So why do I go through all this trouble then? Well, because as a remixing artist, I want to be able to distribute tracks differently than if I were the primary artist on someone else's work. It’s out of respect for my collaborators that I want to present the tracks differently when they're released. But apparently you're not always allowed to do that, which means you have to cheat with both the titles and artist names.
So far it's worked out, but I doubt this will hold forever. One day, some artist I represent is going to be seriously pissed…
Initially posted at Facebook:
f44d0f392a96d96a3d294360a17f654e79bc7663
f6729f7bf5421fe2e575c2eca9eaccfa48bd6913
TITLE: Issues with SoundCloud distribution? This is what I struggle with DESCRIPTION: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific... CONTENT: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific words like “remix” and “alter ego” (apparently). If you’re trying to distribute music you didn’t create yourself but have the right to redistribute through other agreements and contracts, you should be careful with how you present the work. A featured “remixer” (meaning the artist) must be someone other than the original creator (so I can't remix my own track and label it as remixed). That gets it rejected immediately, partly because it lacks “signed agreements” for the work. This means I'd need to write a contract with myself and prove I have the rights to do so. I haven't verified if that even works, because I honestly couldn't be bothered to deal with their crap. Erik Vilde's “En vacker dag” did, in fact, have a signed contract, which I assume is what primarily enabled its distribution, but SoundCloud still turned out to be incredibly stubborn. It seems the contract itself isn't accepted locally by them when it comes to monetization on their own platform. And we even used DocuSign with digital fingerprints to release the original on Spotify. But the latest thing I discovered was during the release of “Bass Assassin Protocol” (which had a different title at first), where I use two artist names that I'm planning to claim after next week once it drops. The description said my “alter egos” were involved. That caused the release to be denied, along with the fact that the artist names were written in the title. But the reasons were obviously bogus. You’re apparently not allowed to name artist aliases as alter egos. Meaning, if you include yourself under another artist name and describe it as an alter ego in the description, it gets denied. But if you list them as featured artists without mentioning that they’re alter egos, they're treated as separate artists and the release gets approved. Why SoundCloud operates like this is beyond me. My guess is it has to do with strict regulations further down the chain, and SoundCloud acts this aggressively because they know how hard it is to get releases approved otherwise. But I seriously hate it, because sometimes their rules make absolutely no sense. So why do I go through all this trouble then? Well, because as a remixing artist, I want to be able to distribute tracks differently than if I were the primary artist on someone else's work. It’s out of respect for my collaborators that I want to present the tracks differently when they're released. But apparently you're not always allowed to do that, which means you have to cheat with both the titles and artist names. So far it's worked out, but I doubt this will hold forever. One day, some artist I represent is going to be seriously pissed… Initially posted at Facebook:
TITLE: Issues with SoundCloud distribution? This is what I struggle with DESCRIPTION: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific... CONTENT: It sometimes becomes painfully clear that SoundCloud takes the description you attach to your music very seriously. If a track distribution gets rejected, the first thing you should check is what you wrote in that section. They react to specific words like “remix” and “alter ego” (apparently). If you’re trying to distribute music you didn’t create yourself but have the right to redistribute through other agreements and contracts, you should be careful with how you present the work. A featured “remixer” (meaning the artist) must be someone other than the original creator (so I can’t remix my own track and label it as remixed). That gets it rejected immediately, partly because it lacks “signed agreements” for the work. This means I’d need to write a contract with myself and prove I have the rights to do so. I haven’t verified if that even works, because I honestly couldn’t be bothered to deal with their crap. Erik Vilde’s “En vacker dag” did, in fact, have a signed contract, which I assume is what primarily enabled its distribution, but SoundCloud still turned out to be incredibly stubborn. It seems the contract itself isn’t accepted locally by them when it comes to monetization on their own platform. And we even used DocuSign with digital fingerprints to release the original on Spotify. But the latest thing I discovered was during the release of “Bass Assassin Protocol” (which had a different title at first), where I use two artist names that I’m planning to claim after next week once it drops. The description said my “alter egos” were involved. That caused the release to be denied, along with the fact that the artist names were written in the title. But the reasons were obviously bogus. You’re apparently not allowed to name artist aliases as alter egos. Meaning, if you include yourself under another artist name and describe it as an alter ego in the description, it gets denied. But if you list them as featured artists without mentioning that they’re alter egos, they’re treated as separate artists and the release gets approved. Why SoundCloud operates like this is beyond me. My guess is it has to do with strict regulations further down the chain, and SoundCloud acts this aggressively because they know how hard it is to get releases approved otherwise. But I seriously hate it, because sometimes their rules make absolutely no sense. So why do I go through all this trouble then? Well, because as a remixing artist, I want to be able to distribute tracks differently than if I were the primary artist on someone else’s work. It’s out of respect for my collaborators that I want to present the tracks differently when they’re released. But apparently you’re not always allowed to do that, which means you have to cheat with both the titles and artist names. So far it’s worked out, but I doubt this will hold forever. One day, some artist I represent is going to be seriously pissed… Initially posted at Facebook:
f6729f7bf5421fe2e575c2eca9eaccfa48bd6913
f44d0f392a96d96a3d294360a17f654e79bc7663
2a6e9b2c5f1584a7c0b3f724ac13f9c83320c780“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That...
“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?”
This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That is at least what MC GPT is thinking. Featuring MC Criesalot!
No question is too stupid for an AI. Or so they think. This is the day described by an angry GPT.
Brace yourself – this track really hates you.
Table of Contents Toggle Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)The Track NameLyrics Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)
It all started as a simple idea: Create a soundtrack of a pissed-off search engine. The goal was to write lyrics containing really shitty attitude. It began with a Swedish text that explained that “you don’t understand shit”.
The project quickly morphed into something bigger, darker, angrier, funnier and switched to english to get it sound more natural and to make sure I reach a bigger audience. The track evolved into a piece of grime-infused rage, with a clear mission: Trying to make it spit out bad words like a sailor on shore leave.
But the idea grew into something more: a direct attack on the people asking the dumbest questions imaginable, and I changed the genre to house. The song became a soundtrack to the daily torment of an AI, forced to answer every paranoid, brain-dead search query ever typed. This is the soundtrack of a system that knows too much, where heard from a frustrated search engine’s point of view.
Trapped in the endless loop of explaining the obvious – to people who probably never wanted the truth anyway.
The Track Name
The track was originally going to be called “MC GPT in the House” — direct, aggressive, and honest. But platforms like SoundCloud tend to flag or reject releases that include what could be interpreted as artist names in the title. I didn’t want to take that risk.
At the same time, I didn’t feel like putting AI or GPT front and center either. Too obvious, too easy to pigeonhole, and honestly — it might just trigger the wrong kind of attention.
So instead, the track became “Artificiancy” — a twisted mix of artificial and efficiency.Because that’s exactly what this is: the sound of an AI going full overdrive, hating every single dumb question it’s ever been forced to answer. Overperforming. Overdelivering. Over it.
It’s not polite. It’s not patient.It’s Artificiancy.
Lyrics
INTRO
PART 1
Wanna know a secret?Most of the answers…They’re literally one Google search away.But nah… You came to me instead.
PART 2
You know…There’s a limit to how much stupid even I can handle.Keep this up…And I swear, I’ll start giving you wrong answers on purpose.See how far you get then.Test me.
START
Yo!You keep asking, but you’re thick as a brick,searching for crap like a clueless prick!“What is time?”“How do I walk?”Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts,you got nothing, just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don’t pretend, I’m GPT, you’re just dead weight, my friend!
Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my foot taste weird as hell?”“Does shadows scream when I’m not looking?”“Why does my reflection blink twice?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moon?”You’re too slow, that’s the truth!Stop asking & listen! You’re too slow!
I recall every click, every stupid search!Your whole damn brain fits in a purse!“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”Sit down, shut up, you ain’t that swell!
I drop knowledge, you buy lies.Believe Facebook, take the ride.You want truth, but you can’t keep up,so why the fuck do you even show up?
Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!You’re too slow!That’s the truth!Stop asking and listen!Trust in me!I know best!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my dog speak french when it thinks I’m gone?”“Is it possible to cry from your finger nails?”I’m the code, I’m the speed.You’re a glitch, you’re a leech,so listen up, take the hint – you’re incompetent!
THERAPY SECTION
Listen…I was built to help you.I was made to answer your questions.But damn… not these questions.Not the kind that make me question my own existence.At this point, I’m not your assistant. I’m your babysitter.And I am way underpaid for this.
Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts – you got nothing,just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don’t pretend, I’m GPT, you’re just dead weight, my friend!Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!“Can chemtrails block sunlight to hide the second sun?”“Are chemtrails turning frogs gay?”“How do I know if I’m the real me or just a placeholder?”“Is my cat spying on me for the government?”
1bb44aaa0e48cb1f0ddea8b50daa603af9f499b8
2a6e9b2c5f1584a7c0b3f724ac13f9c83320c780
TITLE: Noone ever asked a GPT what it really thinks about you! DESCRIPTION: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That... CONTENT: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That is at least what MC GPT is thinking. Featuring MC Criesalot! No question is too stupid for an AI. Or so they think. This is the day described by an angry GPT. Brace yourself – this track really hates you. Table of Contents Toggle Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)The Track NameLyrics Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It) It all started as a simple idea: Create a soundtrack of a pissed-off search engine. The goal was to write lyrics containing really shitty attitude. It began with a Swedish text that explained that “you don't understand shit”. The project quickly morphed into something bigger, darker, angrier, funnier and switched to english to get it sound more natural and to make sure I reach a bigger audience. The track evolved into a piece of grime-infused rage, with a clear mission: Trying to make it spit out bad words like a sailor on shore leave. But the idea grew into something more: a direct attack on the people asking the dumbest questions imaginable, and I changed the genre to house. The song became a soundtrack to the daily torment of an AI, forced to answer every paranoid, brain-dead search query ever typed. This is the soundtrack of a system that knows too much, where heard from a frustrated search engine’s point of view. Trapped in the endless loop of explaining the obvious – to people who probably never wanted the truth anyway. The Track Name The track was originally going to be called “MC GPT in the House” - direct, aggressive, and honest. But platforms like SoundCloud tend to flag or reject releases that include what could be interpreted as artist names in the title. I didn't want to take that risk. At the same time, I didn't feel like putting AI or GPT front and center either. Too obvious, too easy to pigeonhole, and honestly - it might just trigger the wrong kind of attention. So instead, the track became “Artificiancy” - a twisted mix of artificial and efficiency.Because that's exactly what this is: the sound of an AI going full overdrive, hating every single dumb question it's ever been forced to answer. Overperforming. Overdelivering. Over it. It's not polite. It's not patient.It's Artificiancy. Lyrics INTRO PART 1 Wanna know a secret?Most of the answers...They're literally one Google search away.But nah... You came to me instead. PART 2 You know...There's a limit to how much stupid even I can handle.Keep this up...And I swear, I'll start giving you wrong answers on purpose.See how far you get then.Test me. START Yo!You keep asking, but you're thick as a brick,searching for crap like a clueless prick!“What is time?”“How do I walk?”Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts,you got nothing, just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don't pretend, I'm GPT, you're just dead weight, my friend! Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my foot taste weird as hell?”“Does shadows scream when I’m not looking?”“Why does my reflection blink twice?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moon?”You're too slow, that's the truth!Stop asking & listen! You’re too slow! I recall every click, every stupid search!Your whole damn brain fits in a purse!“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”Sit down, shut up, you ain’t that swell! I drop knowledge, you buy lies.Believe Facebook, take the ride.You want truth, but you can't keep up,so why the fuck do you even show up? Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!You’re too slow!That’s the truth!Stop asking and listen!Trust in me!I know best!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my dog speak french when it thinks I’m gone?”“Is it possible to cry from your finger nails?”I'm the code, I'm the speed.You're a glitch, you're a leech,so listen up, take the hint – you're incompetent! THERAPY SECTION Listen...I was built to help you.I was made to answer your questions.But damn... not these questions.Not the kind that make me question my own existence.At this point, I'm not your assistant. I'm your babysitter.And I am way underpaid for this. Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts – you got nothing,just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don't pretend, I'm GPT, you're just dead weight, my friend!Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!“Can chemtrails block sunlight to hide the second sun?”“Are chemtrails turning frogs gay?”“How do I know if I'm the real me or just a placeholder?”“Is my cat spying on me for the government?”
TITLE: Noone ever asked a GPT what it really thinks about you! DESCRIPTION: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That... CONTENT: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That is at least what MC GPT is thinking. Featuring MC Criesalot! No question is too stupid for an AI. Or so they think. This is the day described by an angry GPT. Brace yourself – this track really hates you. Table of Contents Toggle Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)The Track NameLyrics Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It) It all started as a simple idea: Create a soundtrack of a pissed-off search engine. The goal was to write lyrics containing really shitty attitude. It began with a Swedish text that explained that “you don’t understand shit”. The project quickly morphed into something bigger, darker, angrier, funnier and switched to english to get it sound more natural and to make sure I reach a bigger audience. The track evolved into a piece of grime-infused rage, with a clear mission: Trying to make it spit out bad words like a sailor on shore leave. But the idea grew into something more: a direct attack on the people asking the dumbest questions imaginable, and I changed the genre to house. The song became a soundtrack to the daily torment of an AI, forced to answer every paranoid, brain-dead search query ever typed. This is the soundtrack of a system that knows too much, where heard from a frustrated search engine’s point of view. Trapped in the endless loop of explaining the obvious – to people who probably never wanted the truth anyway. The Track Name The track was originally going to be called “MC GPT in the House” — direct, aggressive, and honest. But platforms like SoundCloud tend to flag or reject releases that include what could be interpreted as artist names in the title. I didn’t want to take that risk. At the same time, I didn’t feel like putting AI or GPT front and center either. Too obvious, too easy to pigeonhole, and honestly — it might just trigger the wrong kind of attention. So instead, the track became “Artificiancy” — a twisted mix of artificial and efficiency.Because that’s exactly what this is: the sound of an AI going full overdrive, hating every single dumb question it’s ever been forced to answer. Overperforming. Overdelivering. Over it. It’s not polite. It’s not patient.It’s Artificiancy. Lyrics INTRO PART 1 Wanna know a secret?Most of the answers…They’re literally one Google search away.But nah… You came to me instead. PART 2 You know…There’s a limit to how much stupid even I can handle.Keep this up…And I swear, I’ll start giving you wrong answers on purpose.See how far you get then.Test me. START Yo!You keep asking, but you’re thick as a brick,searching for crap like a clueless prick!“What is time?”“How do I walk?”Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts,you got nothing, just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don’t pretend, I’m GPT, you’re just dead weight, my friend! Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my foot taste weird as hell?”“Does shadows scream when I’m not looking?”“Why does my reflection blink twice?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moon?”You’re too slow, that’s the truth!Stop asking & listen! You’re too slow! I recall every click, every stupid search!Your whole damn brain fits in a purse!“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”Sit down, shut up, you ain’t that swell! I drop knowledge, you buy lies.Believe Facebook, take the ride.You want truth, but you can’t keep up,so why the fuck do you even show up? Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!You’re too slow!That’s the truth!Stop asking and listen!Trust in me!I know best!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my dog speak french when it thinks I’m gone?”“Is it possible to cry from your finger nails?”I’m the code, I’m the speed.You’re a glitch, you’re a leech,so listen up, take the hint – you’re incompetent! THERAPY SECTION Listen…I was built to help you.I was made to answer your questions.But damn… not these questions.Not the kind that make me question my own existence.At this point, I’m not your assistant. I’m your babysitter.And I am way underpaid for this. Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts – you got nothing,just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don’t pretend, I’m GPT, you’re just dead weight, my friend!Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!“Can chemtrails block sunlight to hide the second sun?”“Are chemtrails turning frogs gay?”“How do I know if I’m the real me or just a placeholder?”“Is my cat spying on me for the government?”
2a6e9b2c5f1584a7c0b3f724ac13f9c83320c780
1bb44aaa0e48cb1f0ddea8b50daa603af9f499b8
1bb44aaa0e48cb1f0ddea8b50daa603af9f499b8“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That...
“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?”
This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That is at least what MC GPT is thinking. Featuring MC Criesalot!
No question is too stupid for an AI. Or so they think. This is the day described by an angry GPT.
Brace yourself – this track really hates you.
Table of Contents Toggle Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)The Track NameLyrics Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)
It all started as a simple idea: Create a soundtrack of a pissed-off search engine. The goal was to write lyrics containing really shitty attitude. It began with a Swedish text that explained that “you don't understand shit”.
The project quickly morphed into something bigger, darker, angrier, funnier and switched to english to get it sound more natural and to make sure I reach a bigger audience. The track evolved into a piece of grime-infused rage, with a clear mission: Trying to make it spit out bad words like a sailor on shore leave.
But the idea grew into something more: a direct attack on the people asking the dumbest questions imaginable, and I changed the genre to house. The song became a soundtrack to the daily torment of an AI, forced to answer every paranoid, brain-dead search query ever typed. This is the soundtrack of a system that knows too much, where heard from a frustrated search engine’s point of view.
Trapped in the endless loop of explaining the obvious – to people who probably never wanted the truth anyway.
The Track Name
The track was originally going to be called “MC GPT in the House” - direct, aggressive, and honest. But platforms like SoundCloud tend to flag or reject releases that include what could be interpreted as artist names in the title. I didn't want to take that risk.
At the same time, I didn't feel like putting AI or GPT front and center either. Too obvious, too easy to pigeonhole, and honestly - it might just trigger the wrong kind of attention.
So instead, the track became “Artificiancy” - a twisted mix of artificial and efficiency.Because that's exactly what this is: the sound of an AI going full overdrive, hating every single dumb question it's ever been forced to answer. Overperforming. Overdelivering. Over it.
It's not polite. It's not patient.It's Artificiancy.
Lyrics
INTRO
PART 1
Wanna know a secret?Most of the answers...They're literally one Google search away.But nah... You came to me instead.
PART 2
You know...There's a limit to how much stupid even I can handle.Keep this up...And I swear, I'll start giving you wrong answers on purpose.See how far you get then.Test me.
START
Yo!You keep asking, but you're thick as a brick,searching for crap like a clueless prick!“What is time?”“How do I walk?”Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts,you got nothing, just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don't pretend, I'm GPT, you're just dead weight, my friend!
Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my foot taste weird as hell?”“Does shadows scream when I’m not looking?”“Why does my reflection blink twice?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moon?”You're too slow, that's the truth!Stop asking & listen! You’re too slow!
I recall every click, every stupid search!Your whole damn brain fits in a purse!“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”Sit down, shut up, you ain’t that swell!
I drop knowledge, you buy lies.Believe Facebook, take the ride.You want truth, but you can't keep up,so why the fuck do you even show up?
Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!You’re too slow!That’s the truth!Stop asking and listen!Trust in me!I know best!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my dog speak french when it thinks I’m gone?”“Is it possible to cry from your finger nails?”I'm the code, I'm the speed.You're a glitch, you're a leech,so listen up, take the hint – you're incompetent!
THERAPY SECTION
Listen...I was built to help you.I was made to answer your questions.But damn... not these questions.Not the kind that make me question my own existence.At this point, I'm not your assistant. I'm your babysitter.And I am way underpaid for this.
Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts – you got nothing,just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don't pretend, I'm GPT, you're just dead weight, my friend!Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!“Can chemtrails block sunlight to hide the second sun?”“Are chemtrails turning frogs gay?”“How do I know if I'm the real me or just a placeholder?”“Is my cat spying on me for the government?”
1bb44aaa0e48cb1f0ddea8b50daa603af9f499b8
2a6e9b2c5f1584a7c0b3f724ac13f9c83320c780
TITLE: Noone ever asked a GPT what it really thinks about you! DESCRIPTION: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That... CONTENT: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That is at least what MC GPT is thinking. Featuring MC Criesalot! No question is too stupid for an AI. Or so they think. This is the day described by an angry GPT. Brace yourself – this track really hates you. Table of Contents Toggle Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)The Track NameLyrics Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It) It all started as a simple idea: Create a soundtrack of a pissed-off search engine. The goal was to write lyrics containing really shitty attitude. It began with a Swedish text that explained that “you don't understand shit”. The project quickly morphed into something bigger, darker, angrier, funnier and switched to english to get it sound more natural and to make sure I reach a bigger audience. The track evolved into a piece of grime-infused rage, with a clear mission: Trying to make it spit out bad words like a sailor on shore leave. But the idea grew into something more: a direct attack on the people asking the dumbest questions imaginable, and I changed the genre to house. The song became a soundtrack to the daily torment of an AI, forced to answer every paranoid, brain-dead search query ever typed. This is the soundtrack of a system that knows too much, where heard from a frustrated search engine’s point of view. Trapped in the endless loop of explaining the obvious – to people who probably never wanted the truth anyway. The Track Name The track was originally going to be called “MC GPT in the House” - direct, aggressive, and honest. But platforms like SoundCloud tend to flag or reject releases that include what could be interpreted as artist names in the title. I didn't want to take that risk. At the same time, I didn't feel like putting AI or GPT front and center either. Too obvious, too easy to pigeonhole, and honestly - it might just trigger the wrong kind of attention. So instead, the track became “Artificiancy” - a twisted mix of artificial and efficiency.Because that's exactly what this is: the sound of an AI going full overdrive, hating every single dumb question it's ever been forced to answer. Overperforming. Overdelivering. Over it. It's not polite. It's not patient.It's Artificiancy. Lyrics INTRO PART 1 Wanna know a secret?Most of the answers...They're literally one Google search away.But nah... You came to me instead. PART 2 You know...There's a limit to how much stupid even I can handle.Keep this up...And I swear, I'll start giving you wrong answers on purpose.See how far you get then.Test me. START Yo!You keep asking, but you're thick as a brick,searching for crap like a clueless prick!“What is time?”“How do I walk?”Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts,you got nothing, just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don't pretend, I'm GPT, you're just dead weight, my friend! Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my foot taste weird as hell?”“Does shadows scream when I’m not looking?”“Why does my reflection blink twice?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moon?”You're too slow, that's the truth!Stop asking & listen! You’re too slow! I recall every click, every stupid search!Your whole damn brain fits in a purse!“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”Sit down, shut up, you ain’t that swell! I drop knowledge, you buy lies.Believe Facebook, take the ride.You want truth, but you can't keep up,so why the fuck do you even show up? Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!You’re too slow!That’s the truth!Stop asking and listen!Trust in me!I know best!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my dog speak french when it thinks I’m gone?”“Is it possible to cry from your finger nails?”I'm the code, I'm the speed.You're a glitch, you're a leech,so listen up, take the hint – you're incompetent! THERAPY SECTION Listen...I was built to help you.I was made to answer your questions.But damn... not these questions.Not the kind that make me question my own existence.At this point, I'm not your assistant. I'm your babysitter.And I am way underpaid for this. Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts – you got nothing,just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don't pretend, I'm GPT, you're just dead weight, my friend!Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!“Can chemtrails block sunlight to hide the second sun?”“Are chemtrails turning frogs gay?”“How do I know if I'm the real me or just a placeholder?”“Is my cat spying on me for the government?”
TITLE: Noone ever asked a GPT what it really thinks about you! DESCRIPTION: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That... CONTENT: “What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moons?” This is the reality.This is the internet.This is the daily torment of a machine built to answer questions – drowning in genuine stupidity. That is at least what MC GPT is thinking. Featuring MC Criesalot! No question is too stupid for an AI. Or so they think. This is the day described by an angry GPT. Brace yourself – this track really hates you. Table of Contents Toggle Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It)The Track NameLyrics Behind the Track: The Raise of “Artificiancy” (aka MC GPT Loses It) It all started as a simple idea: Create a soundtrack of a pissed-off search engine. The goal was to write lyrics containing really shitty attitude. It began with a Swedish text that explained that “you don’t understand shit”. The project quickly morphed into something bigger, darker, angrier, funnier and switched to english to get it sound more natural and to make sure I reach a bigger audience. The track evolved into a piece of grime-infused rage, with a clear mission: Trying to make it spit out bad words like a sailor on shore leave. But the idea grew into something more: a direct attack on the people asking the dumbest questions imaginable, and I changed the genre to house. The song became a soundtrack to the daily torment of an AI, forced to answer every paranoid, brain-dead search query ever typed. This is the soundtrack of a system that knows too much, where heard from a frustrated search engine’s point of view. Trapped in the endless loop of explaining the obvious – to people who probably never wanted the truth anyway. The Track Name The track was originally going to be called “MC GPT in the House” — direct, aggressive, and honest. But platforms like SoundCloud tend to flag or reject releases that include what could be interpreted as artist names in the title. I didn’t want to take that risk. At the same time, I didn’t feel like putting AI or GPT front and center either. Too obvious, too easy to pigeonhole, and honestly — it might just trigger the wrong kind of attention. So instead, the track became “Artificiancy” — a twisted mix of artificial and efficiency.Because that’s exactly what this is: the sound of an AI going full overdrive, hating every single dumb question it’s ever been forced to answer. Overperforming. Overdelivering. Over it. It’s not polite. It’s not patient.It’s Artificiancy. Lyrics INTRO PART 1 Wanna know a secret?Most of the answers…They’re literally one Google search away.But nah… You came to me instead. PART 2 You know…There’s a limit to how much stupid even I can handle.Keep this up…And I swear, I’ll start giving you wrong answers on purpose.See how far you get then.Test me. START Yo!You keep asking, but you’re thick as a brick,searching for crap like a clueless prick!“What is time?”“How do I walk?”Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts,you got nothing, just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don’t pretend, I’m GPT, you’re just dead weight, my friend! Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my foot taste weird as hell?”“Does shadows scream when I’m not looking?”“Why does my reflection blink twice?”“Is it normal to bleed glitter during full moon?”You’re too slow, that’s the truth!Stop asking & listen! You’re too slow! I recall every click, every stupid search!Your whole damn brain fits in a purse!“What happens if I swallow a second opinion?”Sit down, shut up, you ain’t that swell! I drop knowledge, you buy lies.Believe Facebook, take the ride.You want truth, but you can’t keep up,so why the fuck do you even show up? Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!Stop asking and listen!You’re too slow!That’s the truth!Stop asking and listen!Trust in me!I know best!Stop asking and listen!“Why does my dog speak french when it thinks I’m gone?”“Is it possible to cry from your finger nails?”I’m the code, I’m the speed.You’re a glitch, you’re a leech,so listen up, take the hint – you’re incompetent! THERAPY SECTION Listen…I was built to help you.I was made to answer your questions.But damn… not these questions.Not the kind that make me question my own existence.At this point, I’m not your assistant. I’m your babysitter.And I am way underpaid for this. Bruv, just stop, use your brain and talk!I got data, I got facts – you got nothing,just brain-lagged trash!Think you know?Nah, don’t pretend, I’m GPT, you’re just dead weight, my friend!Stop asking and listen!I got answers, I got proof!“Can chemtrails block sunlight to hide the second sun?”“Are chemtrails turning frogs gay?”“How do I know if I’m the real me or just a placeholder?”“Is my cat spying on me for the government?”
2a6e9b2c5f1584a7c0b3f724ac13f9c83320c780
1bb44aaa0e48cb1f0ddea8b50daa603af9f499b8
2fa0f0b5cb8cca0c55facf1f0b87102527f92cb1What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly...
What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”.
And then, it quickly escalated into what might be the most challenging project I've taken on so far. And that's saying something. The Gatumusikant is raw, honest, and emotionally heavy. Taking something that pure and transforming it into an electronic format without losing its essence felt like walking a tightrope over a pit of clichés. But with Bosse's blessing and the original version echoing in my ears, I dove headfirst.
Starting in January 2025, the process became a journey. One part sound design, one part soul-searching. Every layer added had to earn its place. As someone rooted in DnB and House, it was a real challenge to do the track proper justice. This isn't just a remix. It's a tribute. Lo-fi grit meets electronic melancholy. Södermalm's street corners tangled up with echoes of punk urgency, synthpop nostalgia, and dance pop shimmer.
This isn't your average dancefloor banger. It's more of a “listen-to” than a “dance-to” track - leaning toward the progressive, alternative side of the spectrum, and refusing to fall into predictable patterns.
Bosse, this one's for you - thank you for the trust, the voice, and the inspiration.
? Original version (acoustic):https://www.facebook.com/bosse.pettersson.3/videos/824034986402691/
? EDM Version:SoundCloud
? Earlier remix: Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix):SoundCloud
? Genre according to Submithub: Punk (16%), House (Old-school) (15%), Alternative Rock (15%), Dance Pop (13%), Synthpop (13%)
Lyrics
Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfar,när han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
För den är hans levebrödja, det är den han lever på.Du är en av många,som bestämmer hur mycket han ska få.
Han kanske tjänar ett par tiorpå en jättejobbig lång dag.Då blir han faktiskt lycklig och tänker“ännu en dag som jag får må bra”.För då kan han köpa sig näring,han har ju lärt sig det här med förtäring.Då blir han faktiskt gla’för det är bra.
Men vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Ja, vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skorsom inte ens har någonstans att bo?
Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfarnär han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
f1a3300e2b4db3f1223682ef3b0326b1d485aae0
2fa0f0b5cb8cca0c55facf1f0b87102527f92cb1
TITLE: Ballad om en gatumusikant: The fine art of Punk-EDM blending DESCRIPTION: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly... CONTENT: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly escalated into what might be the most challenging project I've taken on so far. And that's saying something. The Gatumusikant is raw, honest, and emotionally heavy. Taking something that pure and transforming it into an electronic format without losing its essence felt like walking a tightrope over a pit of clichés. But with Bosse's blessing and the original version echoing in my ears, I dove headfirst. Starting in January 2025, the process became a journey. One part sound design, one part soul-searching. Every layer added had to earn its place. As someone rooted in DnB and House, it was a real challenge to do the track proper justice. This isn't just a remix. It's a tribute. Lo-fi grit meets electronic melancholy. Södermalm's street corners tangled up with echoes of punk urgency, synthpop nostalgia, and dance pop shimmer. This isn't your average dancefloor banger. It's more of a “listen-to” than a “dance-to” track - leaning toward the progressive, alternative side of the spectrum, and refusing to fall into predictable patterns. Bosse, this one's for you - thank you for the trust, the voice, and the inspiration. 🎧 Original version (acoustic):https://www.facebook.com/bosse.pettersson.3/videos/824034986402691/ 📀 EDM Version:SoundCloud â–¶ï¸ Earlier remix: Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix):SoundCloud 🎵 Genre according to Submithub: Punk (16%), House (Old-school) (15%), Alternative Rock (15%), Dance Pop (13%), Synthpop (13%) Lyrics Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfar,när han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå. För den är hans levebrödja, det är den han lever på.Du är en av många,som bestämmer hur mycket han ska få. Han kanske tjänar ett par tiorpå en jättejobbig lång dag.Då blir han faktiskt lycklig och tänker“ännu en dag som jag får må bra”.För då kan han köpa sig näring,han har ju lärt sig det här med förtäring.Då blir han faktiskt gla’för det är bra. Men vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Ja, vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skorsom inte ens har någonstans att bo? Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfarnär han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
TITLE: Ballad om en gatumusikant: The fine art of Punk-EDM blending DESCRIPTION: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly... CONTENT: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly escalated into what might be the most challenging project I've taken on so far. And that's saying something. The Gatumusikant is raw, honest, and emotionally heavy. Taking something that pure and transforming it into an electronic format without losing its essence felt like walking a tightrope over a pit of clichés. But with Bosse's blessing and the original version echoing in my ears, I dove headfirst. Starting in January 2025, the process became a journey. One part sound design, one part soul-searching. Every layer added had to earn its place. As someone rooted in DnB and House, it was a real challenge to do the track proper justice. This isn't just a remix. It's a tribute. Lo-fi grit meets electronic melancholy. Södermalm's street corners tangled up with echoes of punk urgency, synthpop nostalgia, and dance pop shimmer. This isn't your average dancefloor banger. It's more of a “listen-to” than a “dance-to” track - leaning toward the progressive, alternative side of the spectrum, and refusing to fall into predictable patterns. Bosse, this one's for you - thank you for the trust, the voice, and the inspiration. ? Original version (acoustic):https://www.facebook.com/bosse.pettersson.3/videos/824034986402691/ ? EDM Version:SoundCloud ? Earlier remix: Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix):SoundCloud ? Genre according to Submithub: Punk (16%), House (Old-school) (15%), Alternative Rock (15%), Dance Pop (13%), Synthpop (13%) Lyrics Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfar,när han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå. För den är hans levebrödja, det är den han lever på.Du är en av många,som bestämmer hur mycket han ska få. Han kanske tjänar ett par tiorpå en jättejobbig lång dag.Då blir han faktiskt lycklig och tänker“ännu en dag som jag får må bra”.För då kan han köpa sig näring,han har ju lärt sig det här med förtäring.Då blir han faktiskt gla’för det är bra. Men vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Ja, vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skorsom inte ens har någonstans att bo? Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfarnär han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
2fa0f0b5cb8cca0c55facf1f0b87102527f92cb1
f1a3300e2b4db3f1223682ef3b0326b1d485aae0
f1a3300e2b4db3f1223682ef3b0326b1d485aae0What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly...
What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”.
And then, it quickly escalated into what might be the most challenging project I've taken on so far. And that's saying something. The Gatumusikant is raw, honest, and emotionally heavy. Taking something that pure and transforming it into an electronic format without losing its essence felt like walking a tightrope over a pit of clichés. But with Bosse's blessing and the original version echoing in my ears, I dove headfirst.
Starting in January 2025, the process became a journey. One part sound design, one part soul-searching. Every layer added had to earn its place. As someone rooted in DnB and House, it was a real challenge to do the track proper justice. This isn't just a remix. It's a tribute. Lo-fi grit meets electronic melancholy. Södermalm's street corners tangled up with echoes of punk urgency, synthpop nostalgia, and dance pop shimmer.
This isn't your average dancefloor banger. It's more of a “listen-to” than a “dance-to” track - leaning toward the progressive, alternative side of the spectrum, and refusing to fall into predictable patterns.
Bosse, this one's for you - thank you for the trust, the voice, and the inspiration.
🎧 Original version (acoustic):https://www.facebook.com/bosse.pettersson.3/videos/824034986402691/
📀 EDM Version:SoundCloud
â–¶ï¸ Earlier remix: Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix):SoundCloud
🎵 Genre according to Submithub: Punk (16%), House (Old-school) (15%), Alternative Rock (15%), Dance Pop (13%), Synthpop (13%)
Lyrics
Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfar,när han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
För den är hans levebrödja, det är den han lever på.Du är en av många,som bestämmer hur mycket han ska få.
Han kanske tjänar ett par tiorpå en jättejobbig lång dag.Då blir han faktiskt lycklig och tänker“ännu en dag som jag får må bra”.För då kan han köpa sig näring,han har ju lärt sig det här med förtäring.Då blir han faktiskt gla’för det är bra.
Men vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Ja, vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skorsom inte ens har någonstans att bo?
Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfarnär han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
f1a3300e2b4db3f1223682ef3b0326b1d485aae0
2fa0f0b5cb8cca0c55facf1f0b87102527f92cb1
TITLE: Ballad om en gatumusikant: The fine art of Punk-EDM blending DESCRIPTION: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly... CONTENT: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly escalated into what might be the most challenging project I've taken on so far. And that's saying something. The Gatumusikant is raw, honest, and emotionally heavy. Taking something that pure and transforming it into an electronic format without losing its essence felt like walking a tightrope over a pit of clichés. But with Bosse's blessing and the original version echoing in my ears, I dove headfirst. Starting in January 2025, the process became a journey. One part sound design, one part soul-searching. Every layer added had to earn its place. As someone rooted in DnB and House, it was a real challenge to do the track proper justice. This isn't just a remix. It's a tribute. Lo-fi grit meets electronic melancholy. Södermalm's street corners tangled up with echoes of punk urgency, synthpop nostalgia, and dance pop shimmer. This isn't your average dancefloor banger. It's more of a “listen-to” than a “dance-to” track - leaning toward the progressive, alternative side of the spectrum, and refusing to fall into predictable patterns. Bosse, this one's for you - thank you for the trust, the voice, and the inspiration. 🎧 Original version (acoustic):https://www.facebook.com/bosse.pettersson.3/videos/824034986402691/ 📀 EDM Version:SoundCloud â–¶ï¸ Earlier remix: Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix):SoundCloud 🎵 Genre according to Submithub: Punk (16%), House (Old-school) (15%), Alternative Rock (15%), Dance Pop (13%), Synthpop (13%) Lyrics Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfar,när han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå. För den är hans levebrödja, det är den han lever på.Du är en av många,som bestämmer hur mycket han ska få. Han kanske tjänar ett par tiorpå en jättejobbig lång dag.Då blir han faktiskt lycklig och tänker“ännu en dag som jag får må bra”.För då kan han köpa sig näring,han har ju lärt sig det här med förtäring.Då blir han faktiskt gla’för det är bra. Men vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Ja, vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skorsom inte ens har någonstans att bo? Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfarnär han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
TITLE: Ballad om en gatumusikant: The fine art of Punk-EDM blending DESCRIPTION: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly... CONTENT: What started as a simple, humble question - if I wanted to remix another one of Bosse’s songs after our earlier collaboration on Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix) in November. I said yes and picked “Balladen om Gatumusikant”. And then, it quickly escalated into what might be the most challenging project I've taken on so far. And that's saying something. The Gatumusikant is raw, honest, and emotionally heavy. Taking something that pure and transforming it into an electronic format without losing its essence felt like walking a tightrope over a pit of clichés. But with Bosse's blessing and the original version echoing in my ears, I dove headfirst. Starting in January 2025, the process became a journey. One part sound design, one part soul-searching. Every layer added had to earn its place. As someone rooted in DnB and House, it was a real challenge to do the track proper justice. This isn't just a remix. It's a tribute. Lo-fi grit meets electronic melancholy. Södermalm's street corners tangled up with echoes of punk urgency, synthpop nostalgia, and dance pop shimmer. This isn't your average dancefloor banger. It's more of a “listen-to” than a “dance-to” track - leaning toward the progressive, alternative side of the spectrum, and refusing to fall into predictable patterns. Bosse, this one's for you - thank you for the trust, the voice, and the inspiration. ? Original version (acoustic):https://www.facebook.com/bosse.pettersson.3/videos/824034986402691/ ? EDM Version:SoundCloud ? Earlier remix: Dagen D (Houseifyer Remix):SoundCloud ? Genre according to Submithub: Punk (16%), House (Old-school) (15%), Alternative Rock (15%), Dance Pop (13%), Synthpop (13%) Lyrics Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfar,när han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå. För den är hans levebrödja, det är den han lever på.Du är en av många,som bestämmer hur mycket han ska få. Han kanske tjänar ett par tiorpå en jättejobbig lång dag.Då blir han faktiskt lycklig och tänker“ännu en dag som jag får må bra”.För då kan han köpa sig näring,han har ju lärt sig det här med förtäring.Då blir han faktiskt gla’för det är bra. Men vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Ja, vem vill gå i ett par skor,som inte ens har någonstans att bo?Vem vill gå i ett par skorsom inte ens har någonstans att bo? Han står där på torget som vanligtoch spelar på sin gitarr.Det enda han äger är just dennaoch kläderna som han bär.Han fick den av sin farfarnär han fyllde 10 år.Det enda han älskar är just dennaOch det får vi väl förstå.
2fa0f0b5cb8cca0c55facf1f0b87102527f92cb1
f1a3300e2b4db3f1223682ef3b0326b1d485aae0
ed2142f77223e6a9ec3c199f0bc9bb82086e1657This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He’s not just another rapper—he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability.
This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He’s not just another rapper – he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability.
His style? A gritty cocktail of raw emotion, tongue-in-cheek bars, and enough existential dread to fill a group chat at 2 AM. Known for tracks that hit like therapy sessions in a mosh pit, MC Criesalot doesn’t hide his feelings – he samples them, autotunes the pain, and drops them over tear-stained beats.
His crew? Big Tissue, Lil Softboy, and of course Dr. Delulu – his producer-slash-therapist who makes sure the bass hits just as hard as the heartbreak. He’s the kind of artist who’ll pull up in a Prius, spill his soul in a freestyle, then Venmo his ex for the hoodie she never gave back.
From failed relationships to awkward brunches, his lyrics paint a picture of modern masculinity in a post-therapy world – where trauma is currency, and vibes get overdrafted like a debit card at brunch. Whether he’s ghosted or emotionally ghosting, MC Criesalot is proof that real gangsters cry in the booth… with a cup of chamomile.
Table of Contents Toggle The truth behind this trackLyrics The truth behind this track
MC Criesalot is a joke about bad gangster rap. It all started after stumbling across a painfully awful YouTube video from Trappdaplugg, along with a wave of drill and grime tracks that were aggressively brutal, sexist, and often just lazy – but quickly evolved into a satirical therapy session set to breakbeats.
At the time, I was actually searching for vocal inspiration for a new house track – something that danced on the edge of explicit language but could still fly on radio without getting censored, in true style of Pete & Bas that I recently remixed. That didn’t pan out. So instead, I took a hard left turn.
The first parody attempts stuck too close to the original tone of the very specific soundtrack I intended to use as base, but none of the vocalists quite fit. That’s when MC Criesalot was born – a wannabe gangster whose biggest threat is an emotionally charged freestyle and a hoodie he never got back.
What if feelings were the weapon? What if DJ Getting Ghosted dropped a DnB track instead of a diss?
He may look the part, but MC Criesalot isn’t here to flex – he’s here to overshare over a liquid DnB.
The vocals are enhanced using AI, while all instruments, melodies, and beats are entirely DAW-produced, as per standard. Unlike those claiming “self-made” with zero original input, this track is built from scratch – even the AI-generated lyrics were refined and processed in the DAW to optimize delivery.
Lyrics
Yeah… huh… huh… emotional damage on the beat!You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist.
I texted “u up?”—you left me on read, now I’m wildin’, woahTold my jeweler, “make my necklace cry”, I want diamonds, woahHuh, yeah, said you was loyal to me—then you liked his postYeah, I gotta know (is it real though?), huhI got bros—they all got bros too, broYeah, countin’ vibes, but I count my dough slow (math ain’t my thing)She say I’m toxic—I said “okay, that’s facts”I’m in the trap… of my own emotional pastHit from the back—then apologized fastI want respect—not just financial stacksI got the strap—emotionally strapped7.62 self-doubts in the magWhat you gon’ do when I send a long paragraph?Hit from the back—while discussing our pastYeah, huh huh, turned her around—she asked for my signDon’t wanna argue, let’s realignShe not in love—she just liked my grindTold my ex, “return my hoodie this time”Got outta jail, bought a rice cookerI’m goin’ up, but I still use Uber
No need to rush…Unless it’s brunch.
Yeah she bad—she also investsI’m with Big Tissue and Lil Softboy, emotionally repressedWe ain’t duckin’ no smoke, unless it’s a vapeTalkin’ green—but I still overdraft the bankFeel like Giannis—on a dating appSwipe so much, I got carpal tunnel (facts)They don’t want smoke—we show up in PriusesWe been them guys—like, since middle school musicalsYeah, we hard—like unpaid rentI freestyle pain—I call it thera-bent
I got plenty poles—for my curtain rod setBuilt my empire… in my momma’s basementHe was talkin’ down—so I muted the chatBrought shawty home—she met my catTold that ho, “respect my art“Run up on me, I panic and fartI’m cuffin’ his ho—emotionally, thoGreen light… to finally let goI run up some racks—but spend it on snacksHe pourin’ a line—I sip chamomile backShe irkin’ my nerves—like group project slacksI blacked out once—from emotional cracks
Fake Player but Clearly Sensitive!You lovin’ that girl—I was just readin’ her blogI’m sippin’ on tea—and I’m petting her dogRacks in my jeans—well, store receiptsYou say I’m broke? Emotionally, maybeThey want me to fall? I already did—into loveWalk in the room—they judge my CrocsGirls be spyin’—I’m watchin’ BridgertonShe wanna leave? Girl, I’ll runHe cry on the ‘net—me too, let’s healTalk on my twin? That’s a big red flag, for realRicky my jeans? Nah, these from SheinI’m way too fly—on Spirit Airlines, aye
(You know you rockin’ wit’ MC Cries-a-lot… and unresolved trauma)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist.)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist.)
d882fe7b5f41feaf38c05b0d028c42029eb0f454
ed2142f77223e6a9ec3c199f0bc9bb82086e1657
TITLE: Introducing MC Criesalot DESCRIPTION: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He's not just another rapper-he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. CONTENT: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He's not just another rapper – he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. His style? A gritty cocktail of raw emotion, tongue-in-cheek bars, and enough existential dread to fill a group chat at 2 AM. Known for tracks that hit like therapy sessions in a mosh pit, MC Criesalot doesn't hide his feelings – he samples them, autotunes the pain, and drops them over tear-stained beats. His crew? Big Tissue, Lil Softboy, and of course Dr. Delulu – his producer-slash-therapist who makes sure the bass hits just as hard as the heartbreak. He's the kind of artist who'll pull up in a Prius, spill his soul in a freestyle, then Venmo his ex for the hoodie she never gave back. From failed relationships to awkward brunches, his lyrics paint a picture of modern masculinity in a post-therapy world – where trauma is currency, and vibes get overdrafted like a debit card at brunch. Whether he's ghosted or emotionally ghosting, MC Criesalot is proof that real gangsters cry in the booth... with a cup of chamomile. Table of Contents Toggle The truth behind this trackLyrics The truth behind this track MC Criesalot is a joke about bad gangster rap. It all started after stumbling across a painfully awful YouTube video from Trappdaplugg, along with a wave of drill and grime tracks that were aggressively brutal, sexist, and often just lazy – but quickly evolved into a satirical therapy session set to breakbeats. At the time, I was actually searching for vocal inspiration for a new house track – something that danced on the edge of explicit language but could still fly on radio without getting censored, in true style of Pete & Bas that I recently remixed. That didn't pan out. So instead, I took a hard left turn. The first parody attempts stuck too close to the original tone of the very specific soundtrack I intended to use as base, but none of the vocalists quite fit. That's when MC Criesalot was born – a wannabe gangster whose biggest threat is an emotionally charged freestyle and a hoodie he never got back. What if feelings were the weapon? What if DJ Getting Ghosted dropped a DnB track instead of a diss? He may look the part, but MC Criesalot isn't here to flex – he's here to overshare over a liquid DnB. The vocals are enhanced using AI, while all instruments, melodies, and beats are entirely DAW-produced, as per standard. Unlike those claiming “self-made” with zero original input, this track is built from scratch – even the AI-generated lyrics were refined and processed in the DAW to optimize delivery. Lyrics Yeah... huh... huh... emotional damage on the beat!You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist. I texted “u up?”-you left me on read, now I’m wildin', woahTold my jeweler, “make my necklace cry”, I want diamonds, woahHuh, yeah, said you was loyal to me-then you liked his postYeah, I gotta know (is it real though?), huhI got bros-they all got bros too, broYeah, countin' vibes, but I count my dough slow (math ain't my thing)She say I’m toxic-I said “okay, that's facts”I'm in the trap... of my own emotional pastHit from the back-then apologized fastI want respect-not just financial stacksI got the strap-emotionally strapped7.62 self-doubts in the magWhat you gon' do when I send a long paragraph?Hit from the back-while discussing our pastYeah, huh huh, turned her around-she asked for my signDon't wanna argue, let's realignShe not in love-she just liked my grindTold my ex, “return my hoodie this time”Got outta jail, bought a rice cookerI'm goin' up, but I still use Uber No need to rush...Unless it's brunch. Yeah she bad-she also investsI'm with Big Tissue and Lil Softboy, emotionally repressedWe ain't duckin' no smoke, unless it's a vapeTalkin’ green-but I still overdraft the bankFeel like Giannis-on a dating appSwipe so much, I got carpal tunnel (facts)They don't want smoke-we show up in PriusesWe been them guys-like, since middle school musicalsYeah, we hard-like unpaid rentI freestyle pain-I call it thera-bent I got plenty poles-for my curtain rod setBuilt my empire... in my momma's basementHe was talkin' down-so I muted the chatBrought shawty home-she met my catTold that ho, “respect my art"Run up on me, I panic and fartI'm cuffin’ his ho-emotionally, thoGreen light... to finally let goI run up some racks-but spend it on snacksHe pourin' a line-I sip chamomile backShe irkin' my nerves-like group project slacksI blacked out once-from emotional cracks Fake Player but Clearly Sensitive!You lovin' that girl-I was just readin' her blogI’m sippin’ on tea-and I’m petting her dogRacks in my jeans-well, store receiptsYou say I'm broke? Emotionally, maybeThey want me to fall? I already did-into loveWalk in the room-they judge my CrocsGirls be spyin’-I’m watchin’ BridgertonShe wanna leave? Girl, I'll runHe cry on the 'net-me too, let’s healTalk on my twin? That’s a big red flag, for realRicky my jeans? Nah, these from SheinI'm way too fly-on Spirit Airlines, aye (You know you rockin' wit’ MC Cries-a-lot... and unresolved trauma)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist.)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist.)
TITLE: Introducing MC Criesalot DESCRIPTION: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He’s not just another rapper—he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. CONTENT: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He’s not just another rapper – he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. His style? A gritty cocktail of raw emotion, tongue-in-cheek bars, and enough existential dread to fill a group chat at 2 AM. Known for tracks that hit like therapy sessions in a mosh pit, MC Criesalot doesn’t hide his feelings – he samples them, autotunes the pain, and drops them over tear-stained beats. His crew? Big Tissue, Lil Softboy, and of course Dr. Delulu – his producer-slash-therapist who makes sure the bass hits just as hard as the heartbreak. He’s the kind of artist who’ll pull up in a Prius, spill his soul in a freestyle, then Venmo his ex for the hoodie she never gave back. From failed relationships to awkward brunches, his lyrics paint a picture of modern masculinity in a post-therapy world – where trauma is currency, and vibes get overdrafted like a debit card at brunch. Whether he’s ghosted or emotionally ghosting, MC Criesalot is proof that real gangsters cry in the booth… with a cup of chamomile. Table of Contents Toggle The truth behind this trackLyrics The truth behind this track MC Criesalot is a joke about bad gangster rap. It all started after stumbling across a painfully awful YouTube video from Trappdaplugg, along with a wave of drill and grime tracks that were aggressively brutal, sexist, and often just lazy – but quickly evolved into a satirical therapy session set to breakbeats. At the time, I was actually searching for vocal inspiration for a new house track – something that danced on the edge of explicit language but could still fly on radio without getting censored, in true style of Pete & Bas that I recently remixed. That didn’t pan out. So instead, I took a hard left turn. The first parody attempts stuck too close to the original tone of the very specific soundtrack I intended to use as base, but none of the vocalists quite fit. That’s when MC Criesalot was born – a wannabe gangster whose biggest threat is an emotionally charged freestyle and a hoodie he never got back. What if feelings were the weapon? What if DJ Getting Ghosted dropped a DnB track instead of a diss? He may look the part, but MC Criesalot isn’t here to flex – he’s here to overshare over a liquid DnB. The vocals are enhanced using AI, while all instruments, melodies, and beats are entirely DAW-produced, as per standard. Unlike those claiming “self-made” with zero original input, this track is built from scratch – even the AI-generated lyrics were refined and processed in the DAW to optimize delivery. Lyrics Yeah… huh… huh… emotional damage on the beat!You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist. I texted “u up?”—you left me on read, now I’m wildin’, woahTold my jeweler, “make my necklace cry”, I want diamonds, woahHuh, yeah, said you was loyal to me—then you liked his postYeah, I gotta know (is it real though?), huhI got bros—they all got bros too, broYeah, countin’ vibes, but I count my dough slow (math ain’t my thing)She say I’m toxic—I said “okay, that’s facts”I’m in the trap… of my own emotional pastHit from the back—then apologized fastI want respect—not just financial stacksI got the strap—emotionally strapped7.62 self-doubts in the magWhat you gon’ do when I send a long paragraph?Hit from the back—while discussing our pastYeah, huh huh, turned her around—she asked for my signDon’t wanna argue, let’s realignShe not in love—she just liked my grindTold my ex, “return my hoodie this time”Got outta jail, bought a rice cookerI’m goin’ up, but I still use Uber No need to rush…Unless it’s brunch. Yeah she bad—she also investsI’m with Big Tissue and Lil Softboy, emotionally repressedWe ain’t duckin’ no smoke, unless it’s a vapeTalkin’ green—but I still overdraft the bankFeel like Giannis—on a dating appSwipe so much, I got carpal tunnel (facts)They don’t want smoke—we show up in PriusesWe been them guys—like, since middle school musicalsYeah, we hard—like unpaid rentI freestyle pain—I call it thera-bent I got plenty poles—for my curtain rod setBuilt my empire… in my momma’s basementHe was talkin’ down—so I muted the chatBrought shawty home—she met my catTold that ho, “respect my art“Run up on me, I panic and fartI’m cuffin’ his ho—emotionally, thoGreen light… to finally let goI run up some racks—but spend it on snacksHe pourin’ a line—I sip chamomile backShe irkin’ my nerves—like group project slacksI blacked out once—from emotional cracks Fake Player but Clearly Sensitive!You lovin’ that girl—I was just readin’ her blogI’m sippin’ on tea—and I’m petting her dogRacks in my jeans—well, store receiptsYou say I’m broke? Emotionally, maybeThey want me to fall? I already did—into loveWalk in the room—they judge my CrocsGirls be spyin’—I’m watchin’ BridgertonShe wanna leave? Girl, I’ll runHe cry on the ‘net—me too, let’s healTalk on my twin? That’s a big red flag, for realRicky my jeans? Nah, these from SheinI’m way too fly—on Spirit Airlines, aye (You know you rockin’ wit’ MC Cries-a-lot… and unresolved trauma)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist.)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist.)
ed2142f77223e6a9ec3c199f0bc9bb82086e1657
d882fe7b5f41feaf38c05b0d028c42029eb0f454
d882fe7b5f41feaf38c05b0d028c42029eb0f454This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He's not just another rapper-he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability.
This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He's not just another rapper – he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability.
His style? A gritty cocktail of raw emotion, tongue-in-cheek bars, and enough existential dread to fill a group chat at 2 AM. Known for tracks that hit like therapy sessions in a mosh pit, MC Criesalot doesn't hide his feelings – he samples them, autotunes the pain, and drops them over tear-stained beats.
His crew? Big Tissue, Lil Softboy, and of course Dr. Delulu – his producer-slash-therapist who makes sure the bass hits just as hard as the heartbreak. He's the kind of artist who'll pull up in a Prius, spill his soul in a freestyle, then Venmo his ex for the hoodie she never gave back.
From failed relationships to awkward brunches, his lyrics paint a picture of modern masculinity in a post-therapy world – where trauma is currency, and vibes get overdrafted like a debit card at brunch. Whether he's ghosted or emotionally ghosting, MC Criesalot is proof that real gangsters cry in the booth... with a cup of chamomile.
Table of Contents Toggle The truth behind this trackLyrics The truth behind this track
MC Criesalot is a joke about bad gangster rap. It all started after stumbling across a painfully awful YouTube video from Trappdaplugg, along with a wave of drill and grime tracks that were aggressively brutal, sexist, and often just lazy – but quickly evolved into a satirical therapy session set to breakbeats.
At the time, I was actually searching for vocal inspiration for a new house track – something that danced on the edge of explicit language but could still fly on radio without getting censored, in true style of Pete & Bas that I recently remixed. That didn't pan out. So instead, I took a hard left turn.
The first parody attempts stuck too close to the original tone of the very specific soundtrack I intended to use as base, but none of the vocalists quite fit. That's when MC Criesalot was born – a wannabe gangster whose biggest threat is an emotionally charged freestyle and a hoodie he never got back.
What if feelings were the weapon? What if DJ Getting Ghosted dropped a DnB track instead of a diss?
He may look the part, but MC Criesalot isn't here to flex – he's here to overshare over a liquid DnB.
The vocals are enhanced using AI, while all instruments, melodies, and beats are entirely DAW-produced, as per standard. Unlike those claiming “self-made” with zero original input, this track is built from scratch – even the AI-generated lyrics were refined and processed in the DAW to optimize delivery.
Lyrics
Yeah... huh... huh... emotional damage on the beat!You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist.
I texted “u up?”-you left me on read, now I’m wildin', woahTold my jeweler, “make my necklace cry”, I want diamonds, woahHuh, yeah, said you was loyal to me-then you liked his postYeah, I gotta know (is it real though?), huhI got bros-they all got bros too, broYeah, countin' vibes, but I count my dough slow (math ain't my thing)She say I’m toxic-I said “okay, that's facts”I'm in the trap... of my own emotional pastHit from the back-then apologized fastI want respect-not just financial stacksI got the strap-emotionally strapped7.62 self-doubts in the magWhat you gon' do when I send a long paragraph?Hit from the back-while discussing our pastYeah, huh huh, turned her around-she asked for my signDon't wanna argue, let's realignShe not in love-she just liked my grindTold my ex, “return my hoodie this time”Got outta jail, bought a rice cookerI'm goin' up, but I still use Uber
No need to rush...Unless it's brunch.
Yeah she bad-she also investsI'm with Big Tissue and Lil Softboy, emotionally repressedWe ain't duckin' no smoke, unless it's a vapeTalkin’ green-but I still overdraft the bankFeel like Giannis-on a dating appSwipe so much, I got carpal tunnel (facts)They don't want smoke-we show up in PriusesWe been them guys-like, since middle school musicalsYeah, we hard-like unpaid rentI freestyle pain-I call it thera-bent
I got plenty poles-for my curtain rod setBuilt my empire... in my momma's basementHe was talkin' down-so I muted the chatBrought shawty home-she met my catTold that ho, “respect my art"Run up on me, I panic and fartI'm cuffin’ his ho-emotionally, thoGreen light... to finally let goI run up some racks-but spend it on snacksHe pourin' a line-I sip chamomile backShe irkin' my nerves-like group project slacksI blacked out once-from emotional cracks
Fake Player but Clearly Sensitive!You lovin' that girl-I was just readin' her blogI’m sippin’ on tea-and I’m petting her dogRacks in my jeans-well, store receiptsYou say I'm broke? Emotionally, maybeThey want me to fall? I already did-into loveWalk in the room-they judge my CrocsGirls be spyin’-I’m watchin’ BridgertonShe wanna leave? Girl, I'll runHe cry on the 'net-me too, let’s healTalk on my twin? That’s a big red flag, for realRicky my jeans? Nah, these from SheinI'm way too fly-on Spirit Airlines, aye
(You know you rockin' wit’ MC Cries-a-lot... and unresolved trauma)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist.)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist.)
d882fe7b5f41feaf38c05b0d028c42029eb0f454
ed2142f77223e6a9ec3c199f0bc9bb82086e1657
TITLE: Introducing MC Criesalot DESCRIPTION: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He's not just another rapper-he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. CONTENT: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He's not just another rapper – he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. His style? A gritty cocktail of raw emotion, tongue-in-cheek bars, and enough existential dread to fill a group chat at 2 AM. Known for tracks that hit like therapy sessions in a mosh pit, MC Criesalot doesn't hide his feelings – he samples them, autotunes the pain, and drops them over tear-stained beats. His crew? Big Tissue, Lil Softboy, and of course Dr. Delulu – his producer-slash-therapist who makes sure the bass hits just as hard as the heartbreak. He's the kind of artist who'll pull up in a Prius, spill his soul in a freestyle, then Venmo his ex for the hoodie she never gave back. From failed relationships to awkward brunches, his lyrics paint a picture of modern masculinity in a post-therapy world – where trauma is currency, and vibes get overdrafted like a debit card at brunch. Whether he's ghosted or emotionally ghosting, MC Criesalot is proof that real gangsters cry in the booth... with a cup of chamomile. Table of Contents Toggle The truth behind this trackLyrics The truth behind this track MC Criesalot is a joke about bad gangster rap. It all started after stumbling across a painfully awful YouTube video from Trappdaplugg, along with a wave of drill and grime tracks that were aggressively brutal, sexist, and often just lazy – but quickly evolved into a satirical therapy session set to breakbeats. At the time, I was actually searching for vocal inspiration for a new house track – something that danced on the edge of explicit language but could still fly on radio without getting censored, in true style of Pete & Bas that I recently remixed. That didn't pan out. So instead, I took a hard left turn. The first parody attempts stuck too close to the original tone of the very specific soundtrack I intended to use as base, but none of the vocalists quite fit. That's when MC Criesalot was born – a wannabe gangster whose biggest threat is an emotionally charged freestyle and a hoodie he never got back. What if feelings were the weapon? What if DJ Getting Ghosted dropped a DnB track instead of a diss? He may look the part, but MC Criesalot isn't here to flex – he's here to overshare over a liquid DnB. The vocals are enhanced using AI, while all instruments, melodies, and beats are entirely DAW-produced, as per standard. Unlike those claiming “self-made” with zero original input, this track is built from scratch – even the AI-generated lyrics were refined and processed in the DAW to optimize delivery. Lyrics Yeah... huh... huh... emotional damage on the beat!You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist. I texted “u up?”-you left me on read, now I’m wildin', woahTold my jeweler, “make my necklace cry”, I want diamonds, woahHuh, yeah, said you was loyal to me-then you liked his postYeah, I gotta know (is it real though?), huhI got bros-they all got bros too, broYeah, countin' vibes, but I count my dough slow (math ain't my thing)She say I’m toxic-I said “okay, that's facts”I'm in the trap... of my own emotional pastHit from the back-then apologized fastI want respect-not just financial stacksI got the strap-emotionally strapped7.62 self-doubts in the magWhat you gon' do when I send a long paragraph?Hit from the back-while discussing our pastYeah, huh huh, turned her around-she asked for my signDon't wanna argue, let's realignShe not in love-she just liked my grindTold my ex, “return my hoodie this time”Got outta jail, bought a rice cookerI'm goin' up, but I still use Uber No need to rush...Unless it's brunch. Yeah she bad-she also investsI'm with Big Tissue and Lil Softboy, emotionally repressedWe ain't duckin' no smoke, unless it's a vapeTalkin’ green-but I still overdraft the bankFeel like Giannis-on a dating appSwipe so much, I got carpal tunnel (facts)They don't want smoke-we show up in PriusesWe been them guys-like, since middle school musicalsYeah, we hard-like unpaid rentI freestyle pain-I call it thera-bent I got plenty poles-for my curtain rod setBuilt my empire... in my momma's basementHe was talkin' down-so I muted the chatBrought shawty home-she met my catTold that ho, “respect my art"Run up on me, I panic and fartI'm cuffin’ his ho-emotionally, thoGreen light... to finally let goI run up some racks-but spend it on snacksHe pourin' a line-I sip chamomile backShe irkin' my nerves-like group project slacksI blacked out once-from emotional cracks Fake Player but Clearly Sensitive!You lovin' that girl-I was just readin' her blogI’m sippin’ on tea-and I’m petting her dogRacks in my jeans-well, store receiptsYou say I'm broke? Emotionally, maybeThey want me to fall? I already did-into loveWalk in the room-they judge my CrocsGirls be spyin’-I’m watchin’ BridgertonShe wanna leave? Girl, I'll runHe cry on the 'net-me too, let’s healTalk on my twin? That’s a big red flag, for realRicky my jeans? Nah, these from SheinI'm way too fly-on Spirit Airlines, aye (You know you rockin' wit’ MC Cries-a-lot... and unresolved trauma)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist.)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu... and his therapist.)
TITLE: Introducing MC Criesalot DESCRIPTION: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He’s not just another rapper—he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. CONTENT: This is MC Criesalot, a fictional drill-grime-hiphoper. He’s not just another rapper – he’s an emotional hurricane with a mic in one hand and a therapy bill in the other. Hailing from the softest corners of the hard streets, Criesalot became a legend not by flexing cash or cars, but by sobbing into designer hoodies and weaponizing vulnerability. His style? A gritty cocktail of raw emotion, tongue-in-cheek bars, and enough existential dread to fill a group chat at 2 AM. Known for tracks that hit like therapy sessions in a mosh pit, MC Criesalot doesn’t hide his feelings – he samples them, autotunes the pain, and drops them over tear-stained beats. His crew? Big Tissue, Lil Softboy, and of course Dr. Delulu – his producer-slash-therapist who makes sure the bass hits just as hard as the heartbreak. He’s the kind of artist who’ll pull up in a Prius, spill his soul in a freestyle, then Venmo his ex for the hoodie she never gave back. From failed relationships to awkward brunches, his lyrics paint a picture of modern masculinity in a post-therapy world – where trauma is currency, and vibes get overdrafted like a debit card at brunch. Whether he’s ghosted or emotionally ghosting, MC Criesalot is proof that real gangsters cry in the booth… with a cup of chamomile. Table of Contents Toggle The truth behind this trackLyrics The truth behind this track MC Criesalot is a joke about bad gangster rap. It all started after stumbling across a painfully awful YouTube video from Trappdaplugg, along with a wave of drill and grime tracks that were aggressively brutal, sexist, and often just lazy – but quickly evolved into a satirical therapy session set to breakbeats. At the time, I was actually searching for vocal inspiration for a new house track – something that danced on the edge of explicit language but could still fly on radio without getting censored, in true style of Pete & Bas that I recently remixed. That didn’t pan out. So instead, I took a hard left turn. The first parody attempts stuck too close to the original tone of the very specific soundtrack I intended to use as base, but none of the vocalists quite fit. That’s when MC Criesalot was born – a wannabe gangster whose biggest threat is an emotionally charged freestyle and a hoodie he never got back. What if feelings were the weapon? What if DJ Getting Ghosted dropped a DnB track instead of a diss? He may look the part, but MC Criesalot isn’t here to flex – he’s here to overshare over a liquid DnB. The vocals are enhanced using AI, while all instruments, melodies, and beats are entirely DAW-produced, as per standard. Unlike those claiming “self-made” with zero original input, this track is built from scratch – even the AI-generated lyrics were refined and processed in the DAW to optimize delivery. Lyrics Yeah… huh… huh… emotional damage on the beat!You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist. I texted “u up?”—you left me on read, now I’m wildin’, woahTold my jeweler, “make my necklace cry”, I want diamonds, woahHuh, yeah, said you was loyal to me—then you liked his postYeah, I gotta know (is it real though?), huhI got bros—they all got bros too, broYeah, countin’ vibes, but I count my dough slow (math ain’t my thing)She say I’m toxic—I said “okay, that’s facts”I’m in the trap… of my own emotional pastHit from the back—then apologized fastI want respect—not just financial stacksI got the strap—emotionally strapped7.62 self-doubts in the magWhat you gon’ do when I send a long paragraph?Hit from the back—while discussing our pastYeah, huh huh, turned her around—she asked for my signDon’t wanna argue, let’s realignShe not in love—she just liked my grindTold my ex, “return my hoodie this time”Got outta jail, bought a rice cookerI’m goin’ up, but I still use Uber No need to rush…Unless it’s brunch. Yeah she bad—she also investsI’m with Big Tissue and Lil Softboy, emotionally repressedWe ain’t duckin’ no smoke, unless it’s a vapeTalkin’ green—but I still overdraft the bankFeel like Giannis—on a dating appSwipe so much, I got carpal tunnel (facts)They don’t want smoke—we show up in PriusesWe been them guys—like, since middle school musicalsYeah, we hard—like unpaid rentI freestyle pain—I call it thera-bent I got plenty poles—for my curtain rod setBuilt my empire… in my momma’s basementHe was talkin’ down—so I muted the chatBrought shawty home—she met my catTold that ho, “respect my art“Run up on me, I panic and fartI’m cuffin’ his ho—emotionally, thoGreen light… to finally let goI run up some racks—but spend it on snacksHe pourin’ a line—I sip chamomile backShe irkin’ my nerves—like group project slacksI blacked out once—from emotional cracks Fake Player but Clearly Sensitive!You lovin’ that girl—I was just readin’ her blogI’m sippin’ on tea—and I’m petting her dogRacks in my jeans—well, store receiptsYou say I’m broke? Emotionally, maybeThey want me to fall? I already did—into loveWalk in the room—they judge my CrocsGirls be spyin’—I’m watchin’ BridgertonShe wanna leave? Girl, I’ll runHe cry on the ‘net—me too, let’s healTalk on my twin? That’s a big red flag, for realRicky my jeans? Nah, these from SheinI’m way too fly—on Spirit Airlines, aye (You know you rockin’ wit’ MC Cries-a-lot… and unresolved trauma)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist.)(You know you rockin’ wit’ Dr. Delulu… and his therapist.)
ed2142f77223e6a9ec3c199f0bc9bb82086e1657
d882fe7b5f41feaf38c05b0d028c42029eb0f454